Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Trudeau’s Cabinet: The essential breakdown of roles and priorities


Trudeau’s Cabinet: The essential breakdown of roles and priorities

                                                

2943 The Hill Times photograph by Jake Wright
Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.


Prime Minister Justin Trudeau unveiled his Cabinet last week, with 30 members in addition to himself, 15 men and 15 women. In the process, several changes were made to the machinery of government, giving some departments new titles and transferring responsibilities for some agencies.

The Liberal government made an order-in-council to terminate the assignments of the various minister of state roles. The previous government had ministers of state for Multiculturalism, Finance, Foreign Affairs, and Social Development, and the regional development agencies. But the regional economic development agencies now fall under the purview of the minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development, while Multiculturalism is the Heritage minister’s responsibility. Social Development goes to the minister for Families, Children and Social Development.

Five other Cabinet positions were changed “to be styled as” ministers, but are still acting in “assisting” roles rather than the full Cabinet roles of the other 25 ministers. It was not clear by deadline whether this change made in the order-in-council on the day of the swearing-in has changed the salary for these five ministers.

According to the CBC, citing “a senior government source speaking on background,” the government intends to make all five of them “full” ministers, but they are waiting on the Treasury Board to make changes to the statutes of Cabinet roles. It was not immediately clear whether this means the five will have heightened roles or responsibilities. According to the PCO, their roles are still to assist other ministries.

One of them, Minister of Science Kirsty Duncan (Etobicoke North, Ont.), told The Hill Times she had no idea what it meant either. Following the Liberal caucus’ first meeting on Nov. 5, Ms. Duncan was asked if she knew whether her position was formally a minister or a minister of state, or if there was a pay difference.

“I’ve had [a] one-hour briefing, one hour,” she said. “I have a big briefing tomorrow, and I’ve got a binder, and that’s where we are.”
According to the House of Commons, Cabinet ministers earn $80,100 in addition to MP salaries of $167,400, while ministers of state earn an additional $60,000. All five of the ministers in this position are women: Ms. Duncan, minister of Science; Patricia Hajdu (Thunder Bay-Superior North, Ont.), minister of Status of Women; Carla Qualtrough (Delta, B.C.), minister of Sport and Persons with Disabilities; Bardish Chagger (Waterloo, Ont.), minister of Small Business and Tourism; and Marie-Claude Bibeau (Compton-Stanstead, Que.) in her position as minister of Francophonie. Ms. Bibeau was also sworn in as the minister of International Development.

The sixth order-in-council terminated the assignments of the ministers of State. Neither the Liberal government nor the Privy Council Office had clarified what it all meant by deadline Friday.
Here’s a rundown of the new Cabinet and the role ministers will play in government:

Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Minister Ralph Goodale

(Regina-Wascana, Sask.)
The File: Mr. Goodale’s most high-profile responsibility will be reforming the anti-terrorism law, Bill C-51, introduced by the last government. He is also next in line to take over Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s duties if needed. The Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness deputy minister is François Guimont, and the department has a $1.2-billion budget for 2015-16, according to the Main Estimates.

Cabinet Committees: Chair of Canada in the World and Public Security; vice-chair of the subcommittee on Canada-United States Relations. Member of Agenda and Results; Intelligence and Emergency Management; and Open and Transparent Government.
Background: Mr. Goodale was first elected as an MP in 1974, at the age of 24. He was then the Saskatchewan Liberal leader before coming back to the Hill in 1993. He’s held several high-profile Cabinet positions.

Agriculture and Agri-Food Minister Lawrence MacAulay

(Cardigan, P.E.I.)
The File: Mr. MacAulay will have handle the agriculture industry’s reaction, depending on where the new government goes on the Trans-Pacifi c Partnership. His deputy minister is Andrea Lyon, and Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada has a $2.3-billion annual budget for this year.

Cabinet Committees: Member of Parliamentary Affairs; Inclusive Growth, Opportunities and Innovation; subcommittee on Canada-United States Relations; and Environment, Climate Change and Energy.

Background: Mr. MacAulay was a farmer and businessman before entering politics in 1988. His 2015 victory was his ninth in a row and he’s been Labour minister and minister of state for the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency.

Foreign Affairs Minister Stéphane Dion

(Saint-Laurent, Que.)
The File: Mr. Dion will need some briefings from Foreign Affairs Deputy Minister Daniel Jean as he’s expeted to join Mr. Trudeau at a G-20 meeting in Ankara, Turkey on Nov. 15, an Asia Pacifi c Economic Summit scheduled for Nov. 18-19, a Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting in Malta Nov. 27-29, and the COP-21 Climate Conference in Paris beginning Nov. 30. The department’s name is now Global Affairs Canada, with a $5.5-billion budget that also covers International Trade and International Development.

Cabinet Committees: Chair of Environment, Climate Change and Energy and a member of Canada in the World and Public Security; subcommittee on Canada-United States Relations; and Intelligence and Emergency Management.

Background: Mr. Dion was past leader of the Liberal Party and he has been an MP since 1996. He was Environment minister under Paul Martin. Prior to politics he was a professor.

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Minister John McCallum

(Markham-Thornhill, Ont.)
The File: Mr. McCallum will have one of the most scrutinized fi les, fulfilling a campaign promise that may not be possible: bringing 25,000 Syrian refugees to Canada by the end of the year. The department is now called Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada and has a $1.5-billion budget. The deputy minister is Anita Biguzs.

Cabinet Committees: Chair of Diversity and Inclusion and vice-chair of Treasury Board. Member of Canada in the World and Public Security, and the subcommittee on Canada-United States Relations.

Background: Mr. McCallum was first elected in 2000. He has held a number of government and critic roles. Prior to entering politics he was chief economist of the Royal Bank of Canada.

Indigenous and Northern Affairs Minister Carolyn Bennett

(Toronto-St. Paul’s, Ont.)
The File: Ms. Bennett is charged with resetting the relationship to nation-tonation interaction and consultation, and steering the government into a national inquiry into the 1,200 missing and murdered indigenous women in Canada. This will involve reviewing all First Nations-related federal legislation, and removing the funding gap on education spending. The name of the department has also been changed, to Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada, and the deputy minister is Colleen Swords. The department has a $8.2-billion budget for 2015-16.

Cabinet Committees: Member of Inclusive Growth, Opportunities and Innovation; Diversity and Inclusion; and Environment, Climate Change and Energy.

Background: Ms. Bennett was the Liberal Aboriginal Affairs critic in the last Parliament. She was fi rst elected in 1997 and was minister of state for Public Health in 2003. Prior to politics Ms. Bennett had a medical practice.

Treasury Board President Scott Brison

(Kings-Hants, N.S.)
The File: Mr. Brison has been tasked with restoring a sense of respect between the government and the public service after years of cuts, and he inherits the ongoing collective bargaining with the unions. He’ll also have to work with the $6.9-billion budget. The secretary is Yaprak Baltacıoğlu.

Cabinet Committees: Chair of Treasury Board. Member of Inclusive Growth, Opportunities and Innovation, and Open and Transparent Government.

Background: Mr. Brison was fi rst elected in 1997 as a Progressive Conservative but crossed the fl oor in 2003. He served as minister of Public Works under Paul Martin. Most recently, he was the Liberal Finance critic.

Government House Leader Dominic LeBlanc

(Beauséjour, N.B.)
The File: Mr. LeBlanc will be the steward of government legislation and he’ll have to work alongside the other parties’ House leaders while developing communication with the Senate. The Liberals have also promised changes to some traditions in the House that will fall to him, such as ending the use of omnibus bills. He has a $443-million operating budget for the House.

Cabinet Committees: Chair of Parliamentary Affairs. Member of Agenda and Results; Inclusive Growth, Opportunities and Innovation; Intelligence and Emergency Management; and Open and Transparent Government.

Background: Mr. LeBlanc served as Liberal House leader in the last Parliament and has been a Parliamentarian since 2000. He has also served as Parliamentary secretary to the government House leader, and deputy chief government whip.

Innovation, Science and Economic Development Minister Navdeep Bains

(Mississauga-Malton, Ont.)
The File: Mr. Bains has a $1.2-billion budget from the department formerly called Industry Canada, now called Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. His deputy minister is John Knubley, and Mr. Bains will be assisted in his role by Kirsty Duncan, minister of Science, and Bardish Chagger, minister of Small Business and Tourism. He is also now responsible for six regional economic development agencies.

Cabinet Committees: Member of Agenda and Results; Inclusive Growth, Opportunities and Innovation; subcommittee on Canada-United States Relations; and Environment, Climate Change and Energy.

Background: Mr. Bains was a Liberal MP from 2004-2011. His background is in accounting and he has close ties to local charities and cultural groups in his riding.

Finance Minister  William Francis Morneau

(Toronto Centre, Ont.)
The File: The Liberal’s first piece of legislation will be implementing a middleclass tax cut. It’ll be Mr. Morneau’s responsibility to oversee that, which will result in raising taxes for wealthy Canadians. Then it’s federal budget time. His deputy minister is Paul Rochon, and the Finance Department has a $89.6-billion budget.

Cabinet Committees: Member of Agenda and Results; Treasury Board; and Inclusive Growth, Opportunities and Innovation.

Background: Mr. Morneau is an experienced businessman, having led his family’s business Morneau Shepell since 1990. In 2012 he was a pension investment adviser for the Ontario finance minister and he also chaired the C.D. Howe Institute, a public policy think tank.

Justice Minister and Attorney General of Canada Jody Wilson-Raybould

(Vancouver Granville, B.C.)
The File: Ms. Raybould will step into a portfolio awaiting several major responses, and will have to work to repair relations with the Supreme Court of Canada. Atop her priority list will be navigating the future of assisted suicide in Canada. As well the Liberals promised to amend the Criminal Code to tighten rules around domestic violence. Her deputy minister is William Pentney, and the department has a $674-million budget.

Cabinet Committees: Vice-chair of Canada in the World and Public Security, and of Intelligence and Emergency Management. Member of Agenda and Results; Diversity and Inclusion; subcommittee on Canada-United States Relations; and Open and Transparent Government.

Background: Ms. Raybould has experience as a provincial Crown prosecutor and regional chief of the B.C. Assembly of First Nations.

Public Services and Procurement Minister Judy M. Foote

(Bonavista-Burin-Trinity, Nfld.)
The File: Ms. Foote will lead in pulling Canada out of the F-35 fighter jet procurement and starting up a new process for replacing the outdated CF-18s, as well as taking on the shipbuilding fi le. Public Works and Government Services is now Public Services and Procurement Canada. The deputy minister is George Da Pont and the department has a budget of $2.9-billion for 2015-16.

Cabinet Committees: Chair of Open and Transparent Government, and vice-chair of Parliamentary Affairs. Member of Agenda and Results, and of Intelligence and Emergency Management.

Background: Ms. Foote was the caucus whip during the last Parliament and is a former provincial cabinet minister who was re-elected in Bonavista-Burin-Trinity, Nfld. with 81.8 per cent of the vote.

International Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland

(University-Rosedale, Ont.)
The File: Ms. Freeland’s deputy minister is Christine Hogan. Top of the list for the pair will be deciding on the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal that the last government signed, as well as working out details on the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada and the European Union.

Cabinet Committees: Chair of the subcommittee on Canada-United States Relations, vice-chair of Environment, Climate Change and Energy. Member of Agenda and Results; Inclusive Growth, Opportunities and Innovation; and Canada in the World and Public Security.

Background: Ms. Freeland was elected to Parliament in 2013 and served as International Trade critic. She came to politics after a career in journalism, working in Europe, the U.S. and Canada at publications including Reuters, the Financial Times and The Globe and Mail.

Health Minister Jane Philpott

(Markham-Stouffville, Ont.)
The File: For Health, the legalization of marijuana will generate a lot of media attention for the new minister. Ms. Philpott will be in charge of the $3-billion spending on improving home care, as well as working with the provinces and territories on a new Health Accord. Her deputy minister is Simon Kennedy and the department has a $3.7-billion budget.

Cabinet Committees: Chair of Inclusive Growth, Opportunities and Innovation. Member of Treasury Board, and Intelligence and Emergency Management.

Background: Ms. Philpott ousted Conservative Paul Calandra. Before entering politics this campaign, she was chief of the Department of Family Medicine at Markham Stouffville Hospital, and professor at the University of Toronto’s Department of Family and Community Medicine.

Families, Children and Social Development Minister Jean-Yves Duclos

(Quebec, Que.)
The File: Taking over the Employment and Social Development Canada department, Mr. Duclos will have a wide-ranging role, including the introduction of a new child benefit for families promised to lift 315,000 Canadian children out of poverty. The ESDC deputy minister is Ian Shugart and the department has a budget of $54-billion.

Cabinet Committees: Vice-Chair of Inclusive Growth, Opportunities and Innovation. Member of Agenda and Results; Treasury Board; and Diversity and Inclusion.
Background: Mr. Duclos came into politics for the 2015 campaign. Previously he was the director of the economics department at Laval University.

Transport Minister Marc Garneau

(Notre Dame de Grace-Westmount, Que.)
The File: Mr. Garneau will be the point-person on tanker, road, air and rail safety. His deputy minister is Jean-François Tremblay and Transportation has a $1.6-billion budget in 2015-16.

Cabinet Committees: Member of Parliamentary Affairs; Canada in the World and Public Security; and the subcommittee on Canada-United States Relations.

Background: Mr. Garneau has been a Liberal MP since 2008, serving many critic roles. Prior to that he was the first Canadian astronaut in space in 1984, after starting his career in the Navy.

International Development and La Francophonie Minister Marie-Claude Bibeau

(Compton-Stanstead, Que.)
The File: Ms. Bibeau’s first task will be to play a role in refugee resettlement, alongside deputy minister Malcolm Brown.

Cabinet Committees: Member of Diversity and Inclusion; and Canada in the World and Public Security.

Background: Ms. Bibeau worked as a public servant for the Canadian International Development Agency, both domestically and abroad. She then went on to run a local tourism business.

Natural Resources Minister James Gordon Carr

(Winnipeg South Centre, Man.)
The File: Mr. Carr will play an interesting role, having to balance environmental responsibility and indigenous land claims with energy projects such as pipelines. The deputy minister of Natural Resources is Bob Hamilton and the department has a budget of $2.2-billion for 2015-16.

Cabinet Committees: Member of Inclusive Growth, Opportunities and Innovation; Canada in the World and Public Security; subcommittee on Canada-United States Relations; and Environment, Climate Change and Energy.

Background: Mr. Carr founded the Business Council of Manitoba and also sat in the Manitoba legislature. He also has experience as a journalist and musician.

Canadian Heritage Minister Mélanie Joly

(Ahuntsic-Cartierville, Que.)
The File: Ms. Joly’s new role will involve stickhandling the broadcast industry, including the CBC/Radio-Canada, as well as taking on the Multiculturalism fi le and the National Capital Commission in preparation for 150th anniversary celebrations in 2017. Graham Flack is the deputy minister, and Patricia A. Hajdu, minister of Status of Women, and Carla Qualtrough, minister of Sport and Persons with Disabilities, will also provide support.

Cabinet Committees: Vice-chair of Diversity and Inclusion. Member of Agenda and Results; Parliamentary Affairs; and Open and Transparent Government.

Background: Ms. Joly ran for mayor of Montreal in 2013, and she was part of Mr. Trudeau’s bid for the Liberal leadership. Prior to politics she worked as a communications consultant and lawyer. She also once interned at Radio-Canada, the broadcaster for which she’s now responsible.

National Revenue Minister Diane Lebouthillier

(Gaspésie-Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine, Que.)
The File: As head of the Canada Revenue Agency, Ms. Lebouthillier be responsible for implementing Liberal tax code changes, as well as acting on the promise to “overhaul” the agency’s service model. She will oversee the $80-million for catching tax evaders, and eventually work on legislative changes around charitable donations and what defines “political activity.” The agency’s CEO is Andrew Treusch and its 2015-16 budget is $3.8-billion.

Cabinet Committees: Member of Inclusive Growth, Opportunities and Innovation; and Open and Transparent Government.

Background: Ms. Lebouthillier has a background in local politics, and prior to that she worked for 23 years at a health and social services centre.

Veterans Affairs Minister and Associate Minister National Defence Kent Hehr

(Calgary Centre, Alta.)
The File: Mr. Hehr has a host of veteran services to restore, as well as relationships. He’ll work closely with the Minister of Defence. During the election the Liberals promised to invest millions annually in education, counselling and training, as well as re-opening the nine Veterans Affairs service offices closed under the last government. Gen. Walter Natynczyk is the deputy minister for Veterans Affairs, and the department has a $3.5-billion budget for 2015-16.

Cabinet Committees: Member of Parliamentary Affairs; and Diversity and Inclusion.

Background: Mr. Hehr was a lawyer, an Alberta MLA for seven years, and he ran for mayor of Calgary, dropping out to endorse Naheed Nenshi. When he was in his early 20’s he was hit by a drive-by shooter, leaving him a quadriplegic.

Environment and Climate Change Minister Catherine McKenna

(Ottawa Centre, Ont.)
The File: Ms. McKenna will have a high profile both in Cabinet and on the world stage as she is leading the Canadian delegation to the UN climate summit in Paris later this month. She will then have to schedule a meeting with the provinces and territories in short order to determine their climate change plan and establish national emission reduction targets. Her deputy minister is Michael Martin and the department, now called Environment and Climate Change Canada, has a $961-million budget for 2015-16.

Cabinet Committees: Member of Treasury Board; Inclusive Growth, Opportunities and Innovation; Canada in the World and Public Security; subcommittee on Canada-United States Relations; and Environment, Climate Change and Energy.

Background: Ms. McKenna beat out long-time NDP MP Paul Dewar after running a very strong campaign. Her background as an international trade lawyer included working in both the non-profit sector and as a teacher at the University of Toronto’s Munk School of Global Affairs.

National Defence Minister Harjit Singh Sajjan

(Vancouver South, B.C.)
The File: Mr. Sajjan’s will have to navigate Canada pulling out of the combat mission in Iraq and Syria, and reviewing existing defence polices while maintaining spending levels. His deputy minister is John Forster and the department has a nearly $19-billion budget for 2015-16.

Cabinet Committees: Member of Agenda and Results; Canada in the World and Public Security; subcommittee on Canada- United States Relations; and Intelligence and Emergency Management.

Background: Mr. Sajjan was the first Canadian Sikh to command a military regiment. He is a retired lieutenant-colonel in the Canadian Armed Forces, and served three tours in Afghanistan and one in Bosnia-Herzegovina. He then spent 11 years with the Vancouver Police Department, including most recently as a detective-constable. His family immigrated from India when he was five.

Employment, Workforce Development and Labour Minister MaryAnn Mihychuk

(Kildonan-St. Paul, Man.)
The File: Ms. Mihychuk’s deputy is Lori Sterling at the department of Employment and Social Development, which will giver her access to a share of ESDC’s $54-billion budget, according to the 2015-16 main estimates. Her responsibilities will include following through on the Liberal promise to repeal antiunion legislation, such as Bill C-377.

Cabinet Committees: Member of Parliamentary Affairs; Inclusive Growth, Opportunities and Innovation; and Open and Transparent Government.

Background: Ms. Mihychuk’s background is in the Canadian mining industry. She’s a geoscientist who also served in the Manitoba legislature for nine years.

Infrastructure and Communities Minister Amarjeet Sohi

(Edmonton Mill Woods, Alta.)
The File: Mr. Sohi’s largest focus will be on implementing the colossal Liberal promise of doubling federal infrastructure spending to $125-billion over 10 years. He is also responsible for the Windsor-Detroit Bridge Authority and the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Initiative.

Cabinet Committees: Member of Inclusive Growth, Opportunities and Innovation; and Environment, Climate Change and Energy.
Background: Mr. Sohi is a former Edmonton city councillor and represented the city on the Canadian Urban Transit Association. He is also active in the local Punjabi community.

Democratic Institutions Minister Maryam Monsef

(Peterborough-Kawartha, Ont.)
The File: Previously a junior minister role called Democratic Reform, Ms. Monsef’s full mandate has not been fleshed out, but she will be responsible for Elections Canada and for implementing Liberal promises to reform the electoral system.

Cabinet Committees: Member of Parliamentary Affairs; Diversity and Inclusion; and Open and Transparent Government.

Background: Ms. Monsef is Canada’s first Afghan-born MP, after fleeing the Taliban in 1996. The community organizer then ran a close but unsuccessful mayoral race in Peterborough. She speaks English, Farsi and Dari, and at 30 is the youngest Cabinet minister.

Sport and Persons with Disabilities Minister Carla Qualtrough

(Delta, B.C.)
The File: According to the Privy Council Office, Ms. Qualtrough will assist the minister of Canadian Heritage, Ms. Joly, as well as Mr. Duclos and Ms. Mihychuk at Employment and Social Development Canada. Part of her role will include the creation of a Canadians with Disabilities Act.

Cabinet Committees: Vice-chair of Open and Transparent Government and a member of Diversity and Inclusion.

Background: Ms. Qualtrough is a human rights lawyer and past Paralympic swimmer. She was named one of Canada’s most influential women in sport six times.

Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard Minister Hunter Tootoo

(Nunavut)
The File: Mr. Tootoo will oversee the re-opening of the Maritime Rescue Sub-Centre in St. John’s, Nfld., and the Kitsilano Coast Guard Base in Vancouver, B.C. He’ll also steward the restoration of funding to federal ocean science and monitoring programs and bring the percentage of protected marine coastal areas up to five per cent by 2017. The Fisheries and Oceans deputy minister is Matthew King, and the department has a $1.9-billion budget.

Cabinet Committees: Member of Parliamentary Affairs; and Environment, Climate Change and Energy.

Background: Mr. Tootoo is one of the three Liberal MPs that painted the North red, defeating former Conservative Cabinet minister Leona Aglukkaq. He has held many Cabinet positions over 14 years in Nunavut’s legislative assembly. He ran federally for the NDP in 1997.

Science Minister Kirsty Duncan

(Etobicoke North, Ont.)
The File: Mr. Tootoo will oversee the re-opening of the Maritime Rescue Sub-Centre in St. John’s, Nfld., and the Kitsilano Coast Guard Base in Vancouver, B.C. He’ll also steward the restoration of funding to federal ocean science and monitoring programs and bring the percentage of protected marine coastal areas up to five per cent by 2017. The Fisheries and Oceans deputy minister is Matthew King, and the department has a $1.9-billion budget.

Cabinet Committees: Member of Parliamentary Affairs; and Environment, Climate Change and Energy.

Background: Mr. Tootoo is one of the three Liberal MPs that painted the North red, defeating former Conservative Cabinet minister Leona Aglukkaq. He has held many Cabinet positions over 14 years in Nunavut’s legislative assembly. He ran federally for the NDP in 1997.

Status of Women Minister Patricia A. Hajdu

(Thunder Bay-Superior North, Ont.)
The File: According to the PCO, Ms. Hajdu will assist Ms. Joly, the Minister of Canadian Heritage, in her role. She’ll likely play a key role in rolling out the promised implementation of a federal gender violence strategy and action plan. The coordinator and head of the Status of Women agency is Meena Ballantyne. The agency’s budget was just under $30-million for 2015-16.

Cabinet Committees: Member of Diversity and Inclusion; and Open and Transparent Government.

Background: Ms. Hajdu has lived in her riding for 35 years, where she worked as the executive director of the Thunder Bay Shelter House.

Small Business and Tourism Minister Bardish Chagger

(Waterloo, Ont.)
The File: According to the PCO, Ms. Chagger will assist Mr. Bains, the minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development. One of her key priorities will be to implement the promised reduction of the small-business tax rate from 11 per cent to 9 per cent. She could also play a role in Canada 150 celebrations.

Cabinet Committees: Member of Inclusive Growth, Opportunities and Innovation; Diversity and Inclusion; and the subcommittee on Canada-United States Relations.

Background: Ms. Chagger is a community organizer and has experience on the Hill as a former staffer for past area MP Andrew Telegdi.

Sunday, November 8, 2015

ICI RADIO CANADA Finies les folies, déclare Trudeau

Throwback to Trudeau1




6
0:12
parce que le gouvernement
0:14
raynal
0:17
nous avons des problèmes en avant le côté et les trois autres à rafah
0:21
concert commence à en avoir assez de ça même
0:24
pour continuer la station pour leur ouvrir une session
0:29
selon un bref communiqué problème
0:34
lancée on vient au real avec les problèmes dans l'espère le réseau
0:41
et on sait également
0:45
il reste encore un certain nombre de documents auraient eux
0:51
le compte-rendu de la réunion réunit les jeunes de manière isolée et les
0:54
rares
0:57
les jeunes ont évolué et ne suis pas amoureuse stable
1:03
finalement fait la rencontre de l'art
1:06
servat des activités à risque
1:09
non mais
1:10
ces armes
1:11
à l'arrivée il y avait les politiques ou partisanes
1:18
sa hiérarchie
1:22
dans l'appréhension euros
1:24
c'est pourquoi il y aller
1:27
mais c'est quoi le rapport de l'organisme
1:30
subventionnée par les pirates
1:32
des contribuables
1:35
il est subventionné une idéologie
1:38
cela lui a permis de gagner 3-0
1:42
cependant certains pays et la pure manipulation du mois
1:46
il pensera qu'à dérouler
1:48
ils sont actuellement
1:50
et si avec les immigrés
1:53
ils sont unis et suivant les riders d'ottawa
1:58
belvédère des activités partis flamands vont voyager
2:06
on a même
2:09
il s'appelle mis en garde
2:12
les parrains d'honneur à cette reconstitution radio-canada
2:17
et là encore largement dans le gard
2:20
certains cours d'eau
2:23
au relais
2:25
de former un canada uni et moi
2:28
et c'est pour ça qu'on peut les battre a déclaré
2:31
or le
2:39
le palmarès 2011
2:41
la marée noire
2:43
hébert
2:45
parlez nous ment
2:49
directeur
2:50
de radio-canada
2:52
depuis deux jours
2:54
et je sais que ça va durer un travail de tous les jours
2:59
on va essayer leur rappelle sarah de cet appareil
3:03
il souligne andré tillier
3:06
et un aspect moins climatisés
3:08
et je sais que c'est notre responsabilité à osciller
3:12
non loin de là
3:14
et quel meilleur père qu'on vous mette
3:16
la rega
3:18
edward m
3:20
elle est saine
3:22
et ils sont en train de redresser l'appareil comme au niger
3:27
ils ont un travail difficile mais
3:31
et c'est facile vous livrons ici
3:34
moi j'ai confiance
3:36
mais si je réussissais pas
3:38
on a le devoir de responsabilité au gouvernement dans la nature à la
3:43
cuillère en bois
4:06
quand on a pas un seul repas par an
4:09
si c'est nécessaire
4:14
au plan horaire pour l'homme
4:18
et si on va éventuellement à un moment ou à des valenciennois aux abonnés
4:23
oui raconte-t-il en remuant de temps de parole de la majorité
4:28
l'un des siens le le r
4:37
on ne pouvait avoir
4:41
on ne peut aller de l'avant
4:44
un peu la même
4:47
philips a éliminé également mettre à l'honneur
4:50
on est obligé de la mère et le droit à la clé dans la voix appelé à la
4:54
barre
4:55
expert mais certains secteurs
4:59
les sept morts cette idée
5:03
comment va-t-elle gagner
5:05
bamba du canada quand même à un jeu
5:16
menée au mois de novembre dernier
5:19
les nouveaux éléments on est contaminé
5:25
moreau
5:29
chaque le matin même
5:33
exigée
5:35
que vous dirigez armes
5:37
sans ordre de la confusion
5:42
cerclefinance
5:43
le cd&v et le sp
5:48
mais
5:50
il a commencé par jour ils sont venus gagner ici
5:55
en relève en neuvième
5:57
il faut passer par le groupe comptait renouveler
6:02
dans le domaine
6:04
nadine innovations de sony
6:08
je fais appel à elle vous allez avoir croisé le fer au maintien
6:14
je parlais pas anglais cette rencontre
6:17
il est vrai
6:19
faudrait quand même vous exigez gueule
6:23
et à part entière ce qu'ils vont faire
6:26
on a même été annulée
6:30
des rapports au gala
6:32
pour 12 h uniquement
6:37
j'appelle également
6:39
on sait que des milliers
6:41
pour participer à la baignade
6:45
de son côté que ses papiers
6:48
doit devenir un parti de mar
6:50
parce qu'on dit maintenant le vendredi à l'hôtel de ville de berlin c est
6:54
dans la m
6:56
le gouvernement pourrait devoir de mémoire ces denrées alimentaires
7:01
désormais lancés dans la rue pour décider de l'orientation de cette
7:05
société
7:07
face à d problème nouveau
7:09
il sourit et à l'euro
7:12
le dollar se neutralisent le pendant la campagne et la montagne noire
7:16
il faut à présent de libéro
7:19
chez les pros
7:21
on conçoit raisin
7:25
dans les secteurs minier et pétrolier
7:27
au contraire raisin
7:30
partout où les lionceaux
7:32
ou bien des joueurs mardi son anniversaire
7:36
il faut être dans la rue je pense que cela m'a un peu agacé l'art de la
7:40
politique et du sida
7:42
ici on n'y a pas de marge d'erreur est de 3%
7:46
à savoir le balancier
7:48
pour sa part par les pores de la peau
7:53
l'appel à mon goût
7:55
pour m 13 heures
7:57
en tant que militants libéraux
7:59
étape 1 $ par mois
8:02
je veux la guerre
8:05
31 août mais il n'est pas au canada
8:08
ne nous laisse pas indifférent
8:11
en vain
8:13
tout le canada ottawa
8:15
et par le biais duquel noël
8:17
on est certes loin car il sait à part que ça aille bien des verts
8:23
la corvette
8:29
en effet la partie est du pays
8:31
il a été bien meilleur nick clegg est derrière nous permettra pas les
8:35
gouvernements allemand et anglais
8:37
gameloft a expliqué en outre que ça avec la contribution du canada kalt
9:00
à la fois pratique et l'anglais l'année dernière le pays
9:04
parce qu'on n'y croit
9:06
au canada ryan bourque voir cause appartiennent
9:09
à tous les canadiens
9:11
et en quoi
9:13
le 7 mai 2008 avec ce moment
9:16
elle est riche en ressources naturelles
9:20
avec les années
9:21
en attendant la reprise des ateliers animés par an
9:25
par le biais de la délégation partie citoyenne
9:29
en sex-appeal et doit durer
9:32
elle aurait passé noël le gouvernement appelle les rats
9:38
si je dois parler
9:39
au nom de tous les canadiens
9:41
quand il s'agit de l'avenir des fédéralistes qui nous
9:45
merlin
9:52
ségolène
9:56
donc oui
9:59
nous nous battrons
10:01
dont une partie du canada et surtout pas de lui-même
10:05
eh oui
10:08
comme nous
10:10
et quand même des hypers
10:13
sarah steyaert et les poignées et quelques années en même temps elle est
10:18
en train par un courrier
10:20
le plus complet
10:22
eva green it
10:24
fini les folies
10:25
berlin 6

Saturday, November 7, 2015

Justin Trudeau joyfully mobbed by federal civil servants

Bloggers Note: Wonderful complicity -Media Party- blends well with new government ....seem to be prepared for a 4 year honey moon .. too bad Rona Ambrose will spoil the fun once in the House ..and maybe before ...Now I would like to bring attention to a Liberal oversight...when 5 junior ministers (minister of state) we used to call without portfolio (or without spending envelop of their own) become full minister this make the minister of foreign affairs..vulnerable and ineffective and open to be bossed around (bullied) by a minister with a stronger personality..Minister Dion just lost quite a few feathers ...in my opinion and will make the position much more difficult to get things done. I stand to be corrected. Barry James McLoughlin what do you think?
 
 
2897

Things have transformed. Just two days after Justin Trudeau's cabinet was sworn in, it's become a different world for a political reporter. And the civil service is behaving differently too.
cbc.ca



 

Thursday, November 5, 2015

Governor General David Johnston presides over the swearing-in ceremony of Prime Minister-designate Justin Trudeau, Canada’s 23rd prime minister, and members of the 29th Canadian ministry.

Governor General David Johnston presides over the swearing-in ceremony of Prime Minister-designate Justin Trudeau, Canada’s 23rd prime minister, and members of the 29th Canadian ministry.     http:/Canada's new Prime Minister Justin Trudeau (bottom row C) poses with his cabinet after their swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall in Ottawa November 4, 2015.  REUTERS/Chris Wattie - RTX1URF7/www.cpac.ca/en/programs/cpac-special/episodes/90006136/

TRUDEAU SPEECH McGill Ints,. Tuesday March 9

The following is the prepared text of Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau’s speech to an audience in Toronto this evening—a speech that has made news for its criticism of the Harper government.

Thank you, Ken, for that kind introduction. And thanks for all the work you do for the McGill Institute for the Study of Canada. MISC depends more than anything on generosity of spirit, and you have been beyond kind with your time and talent over the years. Countless McGill students have had their lives and career choices touched by your wisdom, and we’re all better for it.

I also want to thank the McGill Institute for the Study of Canada for hosting this great event.

Wasn’t that a fantastic debate?

You know, I dabbled in the debating union at McGill. I even debated Ted Cruz once at a tournament at Yale.
He hasn’t changed very much.

Anyway, I came to the conclusion that I couldn’t convincingly argue for things I didn’t believe in. I congratulate tonight’s debaters for overcoming that obstacle.

As you all know, I had a unique window on Canada and the world through my childhood. But, like all McGill graduates, I had my ideas shaped, tempered and tested by my time on campus. I owe an enormous debt of gratitude to McGill, to my professors and to my fellow students.

Most of you will know what I mean when I say this. One of the first things you learn at McGill is that every room is teeming with people who are used to being—or, at least, feeling like—the smartest person in the room.

Then, as now, since you are all in the same room, basic math requires you to put that feeling behind you.

And if you’re really smart, you learn to do it quickly. You take advantage of the unique opportunity that comes from being immersed in such a dynamic environment. I remember hours spent at Gerts over pints, arguing with friends from the women’s union about whether a man could be a feminist.

I remember challenging fellow students in seminars about a culture of political correctness that didn’t change mindsets, but just drove them beneath the surface.

McGill, like Canada, is an amazing place. And MISC serves both extraordinarily well.

The Institute was created by McGill and the Bronfman family to help us all understand this great country better. To see our history and heritage with clear eyes, to grapple with the challenges we face today, and to gain the broadest and deepest sense of the many possibilities open to us in the future.

It’s a big, important mission. And I want to address one particularly vital aspect of it. I hope tonight to make a modest contribution to the Institute’s ongoing effort—and I’m quoting from the mission statement here—“to identify and explore the benefits that a pluralistic society offers.”

It’s an important mission for Canada, but it’s a uniquely fitting topic to talk about, here in Toronto. This city is the epicentre of Canadian multiculturalism, a place where people from every imaginable country and culture, who speak every language, live and work and build and thrive together. For much of the world, Toronto represents the most hopeful vision of what their future could look like. Here, we are blessed to call it our present.

 
To me, pluralism means diversity, and diversity is at the very heart of Canada. It is who we are and what we do.

We do it better than anyone else on Earth. So well, in fact, that we often take it for granted.

So let’s remind ourselves: Canada is the only country in the world that is strong, not in spite of our differences, but because of them.
There are a lot of reasons for this, but I believe the root cause of our success is a uniquely Canadian idea of freedom, of liberty.
That’s the idea I want to develop with you tonight.

First, I want to argue that Canadian liberty is all about inclusion. We have had deeply regrettable moments. But the history of this country is one in which we are constantly challenging ourselves and each other to extend our personal definitions of who is a Canadian.

This is a good and important thing. It is good for us, good for our country, and important to the world.

Second, I’ll make the case that Canadian liberty has got one of the world’s most vexatious problems right: the interplay between individual freedom and collective identity. We understand that people are defined both by the things that unite and distinguish us from one another: languages, cultures, faiths—even, importantly, our gender and sexual orientation.

However, we also know that all of these contribute to a person’s identity, but don’t define it. These things all find their highest, most concrete expression in the individual human beings who embody them.

This, too, is a good thing. It gives people room to live and breathe. It gives our many cultures fuel to grow and change. It gives Canada over to Canadians, to build as we see fit.

Nous, les Québécois, sommes fiers de notre héritage linguistique et culturel. Avec la Révolution tranquille, nous nous sommes donnés les outils pour affirmer notre identité et notre culture dans le cadre canadien.

Notre réussite est l’incarnation et la manifestation que, dans ce pays, on peut exprimer sa différence sans compromettre l’unité et la cohésion.

Quand mon père a déposé la Loi sur les langues officielles en 1969—que Brian Mulroney a bonifié et rendu encore plus mordante en 1988—il a voulu renforcer cette idée que notre pays a été depuis ses débuts fondé sur la diversité et l’inclusion. Que les francophones de ce pays sont chez eux dans ce pays, peu importe la province dans laquelle ils résident.

Third, I want to make the important point that none of this happened by accident, and it won’t continue without effort. We have built vital institutions around it, but Canadian liberty requires Canadian political leadership to be sustained. Canada is the way it is because Canadians built it to be that way. Generations of us elected leaders from all parties who shared those values and shaped this country.

 While I am deeply optimistic about this country’s future, I recognize that that future is by no means certain. It depends on the choices we make today.

So it won’t surprise anyone to hear me disagree with the kind of leadership we’re getting from the current Prime Minister and his government.

But before I get into the meat of the argument, let me set the table. Plenty of people will wonder why a political leader would bother giving a speech on a notion such as liberty. After all, our politics are supposed to be retail these days.

We’re expected to talk about very specific measures targeted at “key audiences” and “swing voters,” especially in an election year.

But I have an old-fashioned view. I think policies are concrete expressions of values. Priorities are important. Specific commitments are important. But there is no way to predict the events you will need to navigate during your time in office, let alone the measures that will be required to manage those events. People aren’t naive. They know that.

So Canadians ought to know what core values will motivate their leaders’ decisions, whatever events may throw at them.
For me, one of the most important core values is liberty.

Specifically, I believe that one of the highest aims of Canadian political leadership is to protect and expand freedom for Canadians.
I say this not just because the Canadian idea of liberty is important to me, which it is. It has motivated several of the significant policy changes I have brought forward as leader of my party. 

But it’s important to all of us. Our shared commitment to it is the very foundation of the amazing country we have built together.
I also think it’s time Liberals took back liberty.

 These Conservatives pretend to talk a good game about freedom, but look at what they’ve done with it.

They have fallen a long way from the era of Sir John A. Macdonald to the “why do you hate freedom?” taunts of the recently departed Sun News Network.

Their instincts are now to be suspicious of people who do not share their beliefs, to harden divisions with people whose views differ from their own.

In my seven years in Parliament, I have heard the conservative Prime Minister accuse two leaders of the NDP of sympathizing with terrorists, the Conservative party accuse notable McGillian Irwin Cotler of anti-Semitism, and the former public safety minister declare: “You’re either with us, or you’re with the child pornographers.”


For that particular effort, the Prime Minister eventually rewarded him with a judicial appointment.

This, my friends, is not your parents’ Conservative party.
Their approach to politics might work in the short term, but it is corrosive over time, especially in a diverse country like Canada. It stokes anxiety and foments fear.

Instead of encouraging Canadians to fight for one another’s liberty, it tells us to be suspicious of each other’s choices.

Mr. Harper and I disagree fundamentally about many things. None perhaps more so than this: Leading this country should mean you bring Canadians together. You do not divide them against one another.

Fear is a dangerous thing. Once it is sanctioned by the state, there is no telling where it might lead. It is always a short path to walk from being suspicious of our fellow citizens to taking actions to restrict their liberty.

And that, to borrow a phrase, is not the way we ought to do things around here. Not in Canada.

So, first, in Canada, when we are at our best, liberty means inclusion.
We haven’t always been at our best. We have had many failures, the most pernicious and invidious of which is still very much with us: the second-class citizenship of indigenous peoples.

There are other dark episodes: the Chinese head tax, the internment of Ukrainian, Japanese, and Italian Canadians during the First and Second World Wars, our turning away boats of Jewish or Punjabi refugees, our own history of slavery. No Irish need apply. We don’t speak French here, so “speak white.”

The discrimination faced by Greek and Portuguese Canadians in this very city.

For each and every one of these, we look back with regret and shame. And we should.

But we should also learn from them. Mackenzie King ordered those internments because they were popular. In fact, he did it despite evidence from the RCMP and Defence that they were unwarranted. He did it because people were afraid.

When I talk to young people today about these episodes, they can hardly believe they happened. It doesn’t sound possible, not in Canada.

So we should all shudder to hear the same rhetoric that led to a “none is too many” immigration policy toward Jews in the ’30s and ’40s, being used to raise fears against Muslims today.

That’s because the Canada we all cherish stands for the opposite of those dark moments. And for each of those, there are thousands of hopeful, open, moments, where the Canadian journey moves inexorably toward greater inclusion and greater liberty.

The Underground Railroad. The Official Languages Act. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Multiculturalism Act. The admittance of Ismaili Muslim refugees. The freedom for Jews and Sikhs, Hindus and Evangelicals to practise their religion.

We all know the famous quote so beloved by Martin Luther King, Jr: “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.” Well, for all our instructive moments of failure, the arc of Canadian history bends toward inclusion, toward liberty.


We don’t get it right every day. We don’t make progress every year. Sometimes we even take a step back. But as we approach Canada’s 150th birthday, we can look back over our history and see which way our country bends.

The point is that each successive generation of Canadians has fought to expand liberty to their fellow citizens who had been denied it. The naysayers claimed at every step that liberty’s expansion would compromise our traditional values. They said it would somehow dilute what it means to be Canadian.

We can see now that they were categorically wrong. That’s because working to gain freedom for our fellow citizens is a bedrock traditional value in this country. It is in large measure what it means to be Canadian.

There is no greater illustration of this point than the history of women’s experience in Canada.

When I was one, my grandmother Grace held me in her arms before she passed away. She was of a generation of Canadian women that had to fight to gain the franchise. Her eldest son—my father—was born in the first year women were eligible to vote in federal elections.

My mother, who, in many ways, represented a new movement of freedom to her contemporaries, still endured public criticism that would be unacceptable today.

And when I think of the possibilities open to my daughter’s generation, it’s hard not to be proud of all we have achieved. Again, though, much remains to be done. Women still face unacceptable sexual violence in Canada, and discrimination, especially when it comes to equal pay for equal work.

But when you take the long view, it is impossible to be anything but awestruck by the progress we have made in creating a society where women are not just included, but vital to our economic and social progress.

The instructive point here is obvious, but often overlooked. One set of policies in postwar Canada generated more liberty for more people than any other. It was the decades-long effort of the women’s movement to gain control over reproductive health and rights.

Indeed, let me be perfectly clear on this point. The Canada we know today is unimaginable without widely available birth control and the legalization of choice.

Every conceivable measure of inclusion and progress has moved in the right direction since women gained legally protected reproductive freedom in Canada, from workforce participation to educational attainment to representation in the corridors of economic and political power.


That’s why I took such a strong stand in favour of a woman’s right to choose when I sought the leadership of my party. It’s why I implemented a strong new policy soon after being elected, a few years back.

You see, I have this notion that the Liberal party ought to be a liberal party. It ought to stand for the policy that created an unprecedented expansion of liberty for half the population of the country.

The criticism that followed my decision from many quarters shows you how badly we need to restate and defend a clear idea of Canadian liberty. Indeed, most of my critics argued that this new policy represented a restriction of freedom—the freedom of Liberal MPs to vote their conscience.

This is an important point, because, when different notions of liberty come into conflict, it helps clarify our thinking.
Their argument went like this: Forcing a Liberal MP to vote against [his or her] conscience on a matter of morality is an unjust restriction of [his or her] liberty. It sounds like a reasonable argument.

However, it is easily dismissed, when you realize it is based on a value judgment about whose freedom is more important: that of an MP elected as a Liberal, or that of Canadian women.


Let’s be clear on this. For Liberals, the right of a woman to control her body is more important than the right of a legislator to restrict her freedom with [his or her] vote. MPs who disagree with that have other choices. They can sit as Independents, or as Conservatives.

But for me, Canadian liberty is not about the freedom of powerful people to exercise that freedom according to the dictates of their conscience. It is about Canadians’ rights not to have their freedom unduly restricted, especially by the state.

Indeed, this gets to the heart of the Canadian idea of liberty. In Canada, freedom is not just an aspirational value. It is a lived reality. It is woven into the fabric of our most important institutions, from the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, to our uniquely successful approach to immigration, to our cities’ excellent public schools.

In Canada, liberty is a public good. It is not just something that we hope you can achieve on your own, if given the opportunity. It is something we work to provide for one another, and that we have grown to rightly expect from one another.

As my second-favourite prime minister, Wilfrid Laurier, once said: “Canada is free, and freedom is its nationality.”

That is why efforts of one group to restrict the liberty of another are so very dangerous to this country, especially when the agencies of the state are used to do it.

We get a very important thing right in Canada. Not perfect, but right. That thing is the balance between individual freedom and collective identity, which is the second argument about Canadian liberty I want make tonight.

In Canada, we know that people are defined, in large measure, by our relationships to other people: 0ur cultural background, our religious beliefs, our gender, our sexual orientation.

However, we also believe that all of those collective associations receive their highest expression in the form of real, flesh and blood, individual human beings. That is the genius of Canada. We expand cultural freedom by ensuring that individual Canadians who come from diverse communities have the freedom to live and express and grow and change their cultures.

We refuse to see a contradiction between individual liberty and collective identity. In fact, we have created a society where both thrive and mutually reinforce one another.

It was, at its root, a leap of faith, and a very new idea. Over time, we learned to trust that, whatever their culture of origin, the more people engage with the breadth of our country’s diversity, the more Canadian they will become.

In turn, we would change our own cultures. Where there was repression, it would be defeated by the more compelling Canadian opportunity to achieve liberty. Where there was isolation, we would meet it with openness and inclusion.

It may have started as a leap of faith, but it has become a defining characteristic of our country, our great success, and our gift to the world.

We have proven that a country—an astonishingly successful country—can be built on, and defined by, shared values. Not by religion, language, or ethnicity, but shared values.
In characteristically Canadian fashion, we don’t celebrate this success often enough, but the world needs us to, especially now. One of the most difficult and urgent global problems is how to develop societies where people of different cultures can live together and build common ground.

I have deep B.C. roots, but I am a francophone Quebecer, and proud of it. Very proud. But I am most proud that my country not only grants me the freedom to be who I am, but values and honours my culture in a way that has created the conditions it needs to thrive.

We are all richer for it.

Au Québec, je sais que certains mettent en opposition la dualité linguistique et le multiculturalisme, que certains voient dans le multiculturalisme—ou ce que plusieurs appellent l’interculturalisme—une forme de négation de l’identité québécoise francophone.

En tout respect, je ne les vois pas en opposition, mais en complémentarité. C’est en grande partie grâce à notre dualité que nous avons pu devenir une société ou des gens de diverses cultures, origines et religions ont pu venir s’installer ici et se sentir chez eux.
Je dirai aussi ceci: En tant que francophones, plus notre culture et notre langue sera véhiculée, valorisée et promue à travers le monde par le rayonnement de nos romans, de nos films et de nos artistes, plus nous en serons riches, en tant que Canadiens, et fiers de l’idée même du Canada.

This model of Canadian liberty, of inclusive diversity, might indeed have been born of the need for two great cultures who had been historically at odds to make a new country together.

 However, informed by the peoples who had lived on this land for millennia, we have turned it into a model for how to make an unimaginably more diverse society harmonious.
And the world has noticed.

Mr. Harper has been busy trying to portray Canada as a fossil-fuel superpower. He chooses to ignore that the world has already recognized us as a constitutional superpower.

Places as diverse as Israel, South Africa and Australia have consciously emulated our Charter of Rights and Freedoms in an effort to tackle some of the problems that we have dealt with better than any country on Earth.

As the Globe and Mail wrote back in 2012, on the Charter’s 30th birthday: “The Charter doesn’t belong to the Liberals or to Conservatives. It belongs to all Canadians—and, increasingly, to the world.”

Now, for obvious family reasons, I’m tempted to claim that the Charter is responsible for the idea of Canadian liberty I am describing tonight. And let there be no doubt: The Charter certainly expanded freedom for all Canadians.

We are all now free to marry whom we love, women are free to control their reproductive rights and, soon, we will be free to choose to die with dignity.

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms created the opportunity and the vehicle for Canadians to gain these new liberties for themselves. Heaven knows, it would have taken a lot longer to win those freedoms, had the effort been left in the hands of Parliament. More ominously, I shudder to think about what Mr. Harper’s government might have gotten away with, were the Charter not in place.

But I like to think what the Charter really does is hold us accountable to our best vision of ourselves. It requires Canadians to live up to our responsibilities to one another, and to Canada. In an ideal world, it wouldn’t be necessary, but, since we live in this one, we all should be deeply thankful we have it.

Which brings me to the third point I want to make tonight: that the Charter is the ultimate guarantee of Canadian liberty, but it’s not enough. It’s important to remember that the Charter itself was the product of political leadership. It had its opponents, still has its detractors, and we currently have a government that refuses to celebrate it.

It is also important to understand that the Charter might protect us from our government, but it doesn’t always protect us from each other. Canadian liberty might be protected by the Constitution, but it must be promoted by political leadership.

I want to tell you about someone. Her name is Rania El-Alloul, and she just endured something no Canadian ought to be put through.
Rania arrived in court in Quebec last month on a routine property matter. She is a single mom who is working hard to raise her kids. Like millions of women who face similar circumstances, she has a hard time making ends meet.

She was petitioning the court for help.

Like a million other Canadians, Rania professes the Muslim faith. She presented herself to the court wearing a hijab, a headscarf very commonly worn by Muslim women, and women of other faiths, I might add. For her, it is an important part of her personal identity, and an expression of her religious liberty.

Imagine her shock when the presiding judge refused to hear her case unless she removed her headscarf. Not without reason, she said that order made her feel as if she were not Canadian.
Rania’s story is part of a troubling trend that Mr. Harper seems keen to accelerate and exploit.

Last year, after more than seven years of accepting the practice, his minister of immigration declared by fiat that women would no longer be able to wear a niqab during citizenship ceremonies. The federal court of appeal overturned the policy.

But a few weeks before Rania suffered her unjust indignity, Mr. Harper made an announcement at a campaign rally in Victoriaville, Que.

What did Mr. Harper say at this rally? Despite broad consensus that he has no reasonable chance of success, he announced that his government would appeal the decision, because he found the wearing of a niqab “offensive” and was convinced that most Canadians did, too.

Within hours of that rally, the Prime Minister’s party was using it as a fundraising pitch, declaring flatly, and I quote, that wearing a niqab is “not the way we do things here.”

Within a week, I am sad to say that a distinguished graduate of McGill, Minister Chris Alexander, was declaring in the House of Commons that even Rania’s hijab represented an indefensible perversion of Canadian values.

As I said earlier, my friends, fear is a dangerous thing. Once stoked, whether by a judge from the bench or a Prime Minister with a dog whistle, there is no way to predict where it will end.
These are troubling times.

Across Canada and, especially, in my home province, Canadians are being encouraged by their government to be fearful of one another.

For me, this is both unconscionable and a real threat to Canadian liberty. For me, it is basic truth that prime ministers of liberal democracies ought not to be in the business of telling women what they can and cannot wear on their head during public ceremonies—least of all, this liberal democracy.


Cloaking an argument about what women can wear in the language of feminism has to be the most innovative perversion of liberty that conservatives have invented in a while. It is, of course, not the first time the most illiberal of ends has been packaged in the language of liberation.


You can dislike the niqab. You can hold it up it is a symbol of oppression. You can try to convince your fellow citizens that it is a choice they ought not to make.

This is a free country. Those are your rights.

But those who would use the state’s power to restrict women’s religious freedom and freedom of expression indulge the very same repressive impulse that they profess to condemn.

It is a cruel joke to claim you are liberating people from oppression by dictating in law what they can and cannot wear.


Whatever happened to a free society’s requirement that we can disagree with a person’s choices, but must defend their right to make them?

But what’s even worse than what they’re saying is what they really mean. We all know what is going on here. It is nothing less than an attempt to play on people’s fears and foster prejudice, directly toward the Muslim faith.

This is not the spirit of Canadian liberty, my friends. It is the spirit of the Komagata Maru. Of the St. Louis. Of “none is too many.”
Canada is where a million Muslims live and thrive in a free and open, secular democracy. The world needs more of that, not less of it.


Keeping these freedoms safe from those who would undermine them through violence is a vital national responsibility. It is both true and obvious that Canadian liberty cannot exist without collective security.

 As I learned at McGill many years ago, our social contract sometimes requires us to moderate our freedoms in order to ensure we maintain them in the long run. The ongoing question for democracies is how we strike the right balance. We will offer our answers to these questions as part of our national security policy in our election platform.


What we cannot ever do is blur the line between a real security threat and simple prejudice, as this government has done. I believe they have done it deliberately, and I believe what they have done is deeply wrong.


In defending Canada, we cannot allow ourselves to become less Canadian.


Ultimately, my friends, the antidote to repression is liberty.
It is this idea that will defeat terrorism and totalitarianism in the long run. It always has. The lethal enemies of terrorists and dictators are societies that are open, thriving and free—not just on paper, but in the streets.


Those of us lucky enough to benefit from Canadian liberty’s many blessings need to be strong and confident custodians of its character: inclusive freedom, expansive freedom. That is the Canadian idea of liberty: the idea that the liberty of all is enhanced when new freedoms are granted to individuals.


Nelson Mandela, honourary Canadian, who knew something about liberty and about being deprived of it, put it this way: “To be free is not merely to cast off one’s chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others.”


Canadian liberty compels us to resist the urge to impose our personal beliefs upon our fellow citizens, but it is worth it because of what we get back in return. Because what we get back in return is Canada.

Sunday, November 1, 2015

Before he goes, Harper needs to do this one last thing to save the country

Bloggers note: Will Harper abandon his countrymen/women ..and NOT DO THE RIGHT THING here.  I hope Not. JustinTrudeau knows full well these appointments are NOT his.



k

Fill every single one of the 22 Senate vacancies with reform minded Conservatives on your way out the door. Don’t let Trudeau have those appointments. They are yours to make – at least until November 4th.
Before he became Prime Minister, Trudeau said he would change Senate appointments by appointing a panel that would then pick the senators to appoint. An unelected, unaccountable panel of elitists picking who gets to sit in the unelected, unaccountable senate?
It makes no sense and it harms responsible government.
Justin Trudeau would likely howl in protest if Stephen Harper did stack the senate. He would claim it was wrong, an affront to our system and yet he is about to change the senate appointments and make it less open, less democratic.
Let me know what you think of this idea.

JOIN TheRebel.media for more fearless news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.


0:00
let's that the senate I'm Brian Lilley
with the rebel Dottie media I've got a
0:07
piece of advice for Stephen Harper 10
don't think you'll take but we
0:11
definitely should Stephen listen up you
need to do this is a last active save
0:15
the country are you ready
0:17
fill every single one of the 22 Senate
vacancies with reform minded
0:22
conservatives on your way out the door
0:24
don't let trudeau have those
appointments they're yours to make at
0:27
least until November 4th now while it
would be completely legal and
0:31
constitutional for these still prime
ministers the right honourable Stephen
0:35
Harper to do this I don't think he would
he's too classy too much of a stickler
0:39
to do this even though he did it on his
way out the door
0:42
Pierre Trudeau even left a list of
people for John Turner to appoint is one
0:46
of his first acts upon taking over for
the elder trudeau so it can be done now
0:51
let me explain to you why it should be
done right now senators are appointed by
0:56
the governor general on the advice of
the Prime Minister so in effect the p.m.
1:00
of the day
1:01
pick the Senators I prefer a democratic
senate where voters have a say in who
1:05
gets to sit in the upper chamber but
that attempt by Harper himself didn't go
1:09
anywhere but at least in the current
system if we don't like the Senators or
1:13
they screw up his many have lately
1:15
then we can hold the p.m. that appointed
them responsible Justin Trudeau wants to
1:20
change that he wanted to appoint a panel
an arms length panel that would pick the
1:24
senators that will be appointed brain
huh
1:26
an unelected unaccountable panel of the
leaders picking who gets to sit in the
1:30
unelected unaccountable Senate makes no
sense and harms responsible government
1:35
it's a step away from democracy Trudeau
says it will be just like the Order of
1:40
Canada system yet and we see how well
that works out every third right
1:44
third-rate playwright that you've never
heard of get in but Don Cherry Hill get
1:50
into the Order of Canada he's been
nominated but ignored the order also
1:54
doesn't like conservatives former
Ontario Premier Bob Rae you democrat he
1:58
was inducted into the Order of Canada in
2005 years after he left office in
2:02
disgrace Mike Harris the conservative
that replaced him and then won a second
2:06
majority he's not a member
2:08
elitist like to draw from their own
crowds and not let
2:10
riff-raff in its going to be the same
with the Senate Justin Trudeau would
2:15
like would likely howl in protest of
Stephen Harper did stack the senate he
2:19
would claim that was wrong in front of
the system yet he's about to change the
2:22
Senate appointment process to make it
less open less democratic Stephen listen
2:27
to me appoint all 22 senators in one day
then dropped the mic clip true to the
2:32
bird and fly back to Calgary what do you
think of this idea let me know you can
2:36
email me Brian at the rebel . media you
tell me who should go into the senate
2:41
Stephen Harper leaves office