Health Canada EXPOSED After Hiding Vaccine Manufacturing Secrets

 Health Canada has sidestepped detailed parliamentary questions about the manufacturing oversight of the plasmid DNA template used in the modified RNA-based COVID-19 vaccines, prompting renewed criticism over the depth of regulatory scrutiny applied to these novel products.

 

Health Canada EXPOSED After Hiding Vaccine Manufacturing Secrets       https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv-eySq12mU

 

 

..

 

 

 

0:00

Health Canada has buried explosive questions about the DNA blueprint of the COVID modified RNA shots, proving safe and effective was marketing all along.

0:09

9 seconds

Every single vaccine available in Canada has been approved by Health Canada.

0:15

15 seconds

Anyone who questioned anything related to the government's handling of CO any level of government got smeared, bullied, and cancelled.

0:23

23 seconds

Conservative MP Ted Faulk asked who made the plasma DNA, who cut it open, and checked for purity. Were any facilities inspected? Did they test for residual

0:32

32 seconds

DNA and the SV40 promoter? Health Canada's answer, complete evasion. Just trust us. We authorized it. Canadians

0:39

39 seconds

paid $9 billion last year for this federal department and they outsource your safety to Fizer and Madna. Let's dig in.

0:49

49 seconds

For years, I've been following Health Canada's handling of these modified RNA CO9 shots. As I've shown multiple times before, safe and effective is just a

0:58

58 seconds

marketing mantra. And today, we have fresh proof that when it comes to real accountability on the manufacturing process, especially the plasmid DNA

1:07

1 minute, 7 seconds

template, that's the very starting material for these shots. Health Canada doesn't just dodge questions around it.

1:13

1 minute, 13 seconds

They refuse outright to answer anything at all. An order paper question, which is an official parliamentary request,

1:20

1 minute, 20 seconds

was filed with very specific, very technical questions. essentially asking Health Canada to detail the entire chain of how the DNA starting material for the

1:29

1 minute, 29 seconds

modified RNA co vaccines was made, tested, regulated, and monitored from the earliest manufacturing stage through

1:36

1 minute, 36 seconds

to any potential quality problems after release. Conservative MP Ted Faulk asks who made the DNA starting material,

1:43

1 minute, 43 seconds

including which facilities and companies were responsible for manufacturing the plasma DNA template. That's the DNA blueprint used to produce the COVID

1:51

1 minute, 51 seconds

vaccine mRNA, including who cut and prepared that DNA through a process called linearization, where the circular

1:58

1 minute, 58 seconds

plasmid DNA is cut into a linear form so it can be used as the template for mRNA production. And who performed quality

2:07

2 minutes, 7 seconds

control testing? Did Health Canada ever inspect those facilities? And if inspections happened, which facilities

2:14

2 minutes, 14 seconds

were inspected when, by whom, and for what purpose? If inspections did not happen, then why not? If you'd like to see more reports on this file and

2:22

2 minutes, 22 seconds

support this kind of journalism, please do so at nosheshots.ca. That's no moreshots.ca.

2:30

2 minutes, 30 seconds

What quality control oversight was done either directly by Health Canada or through information shared by foreign regulators regarding the DNA template

2:37

2 minutes, 37 seconds

itself? the original plasmid source and any outsourced manufacturing were any manufacturing concerns or unresolved

2:44

2 minutes, 44 seconds

issues found by Health Canada such as deficiencies, unanswered questions or qualification problems related to the

2:51

2 minutes, 51 seconds

plasma DNA manufacturing process and if so, how were those issues resolved? The request goes on to question if Fiser and

2:59

2 minutes, 59 seconds

Madna followed international standards and complied with international biotechnology and gene therapy standards including international council for

3:06

3 minutes, 6 seconds

harmonization of technical requirements for pharmaceuticals for human use called guidelines and United States Pharmacopia

3:14

3 minutes, 14 seconds

USP standards related to residual DNA testing, genetic construct characterization and viral safety controls. If those standards were not

3:22

3 minutes, 22 seconds

required, this query asks why. Were any manufacturing materials shared across companies or countries? Did Health

3:29

3 minutes, 29 seconds

Canada know of any shared or outsourced master plasmid cell bank arrangements essentially centralized DNA source stocks used across multiple companies,

3:38

3 minutes, 38 seconds

facilities or jurisdiction by Fiser, Madna or related entities? Lastly, were there any problems with inadequate DNA processing, such as incomplete

3:46

3 minutes, 46 seconds

linearization, meaning cases where circular plasma DNA may not have been fully processed into the correct form

3:53

3 minutes, 53 seconds

during manufacturing? And does Health Canada have any deviation reports, corrective action plans, lot investigations, product complaints, or

4:01

4 minutes, 1 second

safety escalations connected to those issues in Fizer or Madna vaccine batches specifically. In plain language, the

4:08

4 minutes, 8 seconds

overall direction of the request is to determine who controlled the DNA manufacturing process, how closely Health Canada oversaw it, and whether

4:16

4 minutes, 16 seconds

international quality standards were applied, whether regulators identified or investigated any manufacturing irregularities involving residual or

4:24

4 minutes, 24 seconds

improperly processed DNA. Those are straightforward questions about the foundational building blocks of these novel products that I've explored before

4:31

4 minutes, 31 seconds

with experts like Kevin Mccernin, Maria Gucci, and David Speaker. But the answers from Health Canada, they amount to little more than bureaucratic

4:39

4 minutes, 39 seconds

stonewalling. As though they've done their regulatory due diligence, Health Canada largely sidestepped the specifics on who actually manufactured and

4:48

4 minutes, 48 seconds

linearized the plasma DNA templates, what inspections, if any, they conducted on manufacturing facilities, and whether they verified compliance with key and

4:57

4 minutes, 57 seconds

USP standards for residual DNA, genetic construct characterization, and viral safety. They leaned heavily on reliance

5:05

5 minutes, 5 seconds

on foreign regulators and sponsor data from Fizer and Madna without detailing independent Canadian oversight of the foundational DNA starting material.

5:13

5 minutes, 13 seconds

Again, that very blueprint for these modified RNA products. What's the point of having a health agency with a mandate to regulate safety, efficacy, and

5:21

5 minutes, 21 seconds

quality of pharmaceuticals in Canada overseeing their pre-market approval, clinical trials, and post-market surveillance under the banner of

5:29

5 minutes, 29 seconds

protecting public health. If on some of the most technically important manufacturing questions, it simply

5:36

5 minutes, 36 seconds

defers to foreign regulators and manufacturer provided asurances. Why did Canadians pay nearly $9 billion for this

5:45

5 minutes, 45 seconds

agency last year if it just outsources its mandate with such critical responsibilities left in the hands of

5:52

5 minutes, 52 seconds

others? Look, all of this tracks with what I've uncovered through exclusive investigation into these novel shots. Do

5:59

5 minutes, 59 seconds

you remember when genomics expert Kevin Mccernin first flagged concerns around these instability issues of these shots in 2022? I was there talking to him. Dr.

6:08

6 minutes, 8 seconds

David Speaker's follow-up work on Ontario pharmacy vials confirmed elevated DNA fragments often larger than

6:16

6 minutes, 16 seconds

what regulators claimed to be safe, including the SV40 elements, which were only found in Fizer shots. Former regulatory specialist and pharmacist

6:25

6 minutes, 25 seconds

Maria Gucci has been relentless in dissecting the manufacturing inconsistencies, the switch from clean PCR, mRNA, in trials to plasmid-based

6:34

6 minutes, 34 seconds

production for mass rollout, and the downstream quality failures Health Canada appears to have accepted without robust scrutiny. Health Canada has known

6:43

6 minutes, 43 seconds

about these contamination signals for years, yet continued to authorize and endorse these products. They confirmed

6:50

6 minutes, 50 seconds

the undisclosed SV40 sequence presence when pressed about it, but downplayed and dismissed concerns about the risks

6:58

6 minutes, 58 seconds

posed. Dr. David Speaker, a verologist who was a team of independent scientists scrutinizing the contents of Fiser and

7:05

7 minutes, 5 seconds

Madna vaccine vials, explained to me in October of 2023 that the residual DNA and contaminants should have been purified out during manufacturing, but

7:13

7 minutes, 13 seconds

they weren't. and he says that Health Canada hasn't even considered the risk this poses to human health.

7:20

7 minutes, 20 seconds

Also, double stranded DNA is known to cause an unwanted immune response.

7:30

7 minutes, 30 seconds

You've got a foreign sequence there. It is unwanted. Even if we bombard a cell

7:38

7 minutes, 38 seconds

with a low short DNA fragment size, it can cause

7:45

7 minutes, 45 seconds

severe effects and cellular intration, especially with SV40. It's a big risk

7:54

7 minutes, 54 seconds

which I don't think Health Canada has even considered yet. In Health Canada's response to this

8:02

8 minutes, 2 seconds

parliamentary query signed off by MP Maggie Kai, they offered no transparent accounting of master cell banks, shared

8:09

8 minutes, 9 seconds

plasmid stocks, incomplete linearization deviations, or lot specific investigations. Instead, we're handed the regulatory equivalent of, "Trust us,

8:18

8 minutes, 18 seconds

we checked." Because apparently authorization itself is now being presented as proof that Health Canada did its due diligence. If a product has

8:26

8 minutes, 26 seconds

been authorized by Health Canada, it has been determined to be compliant with the relevant regulations is the circular logic that they use. Not one single

8:35

8 minutes, 35 seconds

facility is named. Not one inspection date or inspector was named. Not a single word on whether they ever checked

8:42

8 minutes, 42 seconds

that linearization process or residual DNA removal. They don't even admit whether inspections were done at all or

8:50

8 minutes, 50 seconds

why they weren't. They don't confirm or deny compliance with th those specific and USP standards the question asks

8:58

8 minutes, 58 seconds

about. They don't say boo about deviation reports or incomplete linearization. And still these aren't abstract technicalities. their core to

9:07

9 minutes, 7 seconds

whether this novel modified RNA technology was produced under proper controls or rushed out with hidden

9:15

9 minutes, 15 seconds

impurities that could drive integration risks, inflammation, as we've seen with myocarditis and the like, or worse. The

9:22

9 minutes, 22 seconds

experts I've interviewed repeatedly over the last few years have laid out the science. The parliamentary questions demanded the records. Once again, Health

9:32

9 minutes, 32 seconds

Canada's non-answers just add to the mountain of evidence that safe and effective was marketing, not medicine.

9:39

9 minutes, 39 seconds

An ongoing evasion keeps the narrative alive and well. For Rebel News, I'm Tamar Ugalini.