How Erin O'Toole won the Conservative leadership race

Could new Conservative leader Erin O'Toole shake up the polls?

"Human 2.0"? A Wake-Up Call To The World

"Human 2.0"? A Wake-Up Call To The World

00:00

- So, what do you think
about going from "Human 1.0"

00:02

to "Human 2.0", and what does that mean?

00:06

Well, going from humans
as we now know ourselves

00:10

to "Human 2.0" has something
to do with "transhumanism".

00:14

If you're not familiar with that term,

00:17

it's about taking humans
as we know ourselves

00:22

and melding with artificial intelligence,

00:25

kind of like being in "The Matrix"

00:27

if you've ever seen that movie.

00:29

And that may seem kind of cool to you.

00:32

We might have some superhuman abilities,

00:34

maybe be able to think of
something and it happens.

00:39

Maybe have some physical abilities

00:41

that would be almost superhuman like.

00:43

That's the idea,

00:44

that's what you see in sci-fi movies.

00:47

And for myself thinking about this topic,

00:50

I'm like, well, I have some time.

00:51

I think that's many years in the future.

00:54

However, this question, this idea

00:58

is now right in this moment.

01:01

We need to make a decision.

01:02

And I found out that we need
to make a decision about this

01:06

because I investigated the
proposed COVID-19 vaccine,

01:11

and this is my alarm call to the world.

01:15

I looked at the pros and
cons, and it frightens me.

01:20

And I want you to know about this.

01:21

You need to be very well
informed because this new vaccine

01:24

is not like your normal flu vaccine.

01:27

This is something very different.

01:29

This is something brand new.

01:30

This is something completely
experimental on the human race.

01:33

And it's not just about
being a different vaccine.

01:36

There are technologies
that are being introduced

01:39

with this vaccine that can
change the way we live,

01:42

who we are and what we
are, and very quickly.

01:47

I think that, you know, some people

01:50

that you might know
these names, Elon Musk,

01:53

who is the founder of Space
X and Tesla Automotive,

01:57

as well as Ray Kurzweil,

01:58

who is one of the big wigs of Google.

02:03

These are self-proclaimed transhumanists.

02:06

They believe that we
should go to "Human 2.0",

02:10

and they are very big proponents of this.

02:13

There's a lot of other people

02:15

that you might know their names.

02:16

They're also involved with this.
So you should look that up.

02:21

I think the easiest way
to explain this to you

02:23

is to go with one of the
front runners for the vaccine

02:26

and go into a little bit of the history

02:28

and tell you how they
want to make the vaccine.

02:31

And I think that will speak volumes.

02:34

So for instance, Moderna

02:35

is one of the front runners
for the COVID-19 vaccine.

02:39

You should know that Moderna was founded

02:42

by a person from Harvard, Derek Rossi,

02:47

and this researcher
actually was successful

02:50

in taking some modified RNA

02:53

and being able to reprogram
a stem cell in the body

02:58

and change the function of the stem cell.

03:00

He actually made it
genetically modified, okay?

03:04

So you can, he proved

03:06

that you can genetically modify something

03:09

by using modified RNA.

03:12

So they founded the company
Moderna on this concept.

03:16

It's kind of a new kid on the block, okay?

03:17

It's not been around that long.

03:19

In fact, it hasn't even made
any vaccine for a human before.

03:23

It's made no medicine for a human before.

03:25

This will be their first run.

03:28

You must know that Moderna
was in the news recently

03:32

because it really fast-tracked,

03:35

it's like the other companies,

03:36

it's fast-tracking the vaccine.

03:38

It's going from phase one to
phase two very, very quickly.

03:43

In fact, it's gone from
phase one to phase three

03:47

in it's experiments

03:48

from March of this year until currently.

03:51

I mean, that is unbelievable.

03:53

It usually takes five or six years.

03:55

How are they able to
do this with the safety

03:57

and efficacy data that we need?

04:00

And I want you to know that in phase two,

04:02

we only use between,

04:04

they're only using
between 30 and 45 humans.

04:07

In Moderna's test study,
they only used 45 humans.

04:12

And with the high-dose
vaccine group, they got,

04:17

100% of those people got
systemic side effects.

04:22

100, that's only in the
short side-effect profile.

04:26

And the low-dose vaccine, 80%,

04:29

80% got systemic side effects.

04:32

Now we don't even know the
longterm side effects from that.

04:35

We would need a lot longer
time, right? Maybe years.

04:39

But we do know based on
previous animal studies

04:41

of using this technology
that you're going to,

04:45

you can expect possibly
increased cancer rates,

04:49

increased mutant genes, mutagenesis,

04:52

also increased auto-immune reactions.

04:55

For instance, in some
of the ferret studies,

04:57

they saw that when the ferret
was introduced to the virus

05:02

that they were trying to
protect the ferret from

05:04

after the ferret got the vaccine,

05:06

they actually had an
exaggerated immune response.

05:09

It actually hurt the ferret.

05:10

They had more lung
inflammation, more lung fluid,

05:13

even some problems with their liver.

05:15

It actually hurts them.
They had a poorer response.

05:19

Okay, so this, those are
longer-term reactions,

05:22

and that could be seen with this vaccine,

05:24

but we don't know the data yet.

05:26

So it's not without risks.

05:28

And, how are they doing this?

05:31

Well, they're actually
suggesting to use a platform.

05:37

Let me just explain how they
would administer the vaccine.

05:42

So the vaccine,

05:44

there's an idea called
microneedle platform, okay?

05:48

This was developed by MIT,

05:50

and they said it could be
very easily produced, okay?

05:54

And mass produced.

05:55

This is why they're
proposing this technology.

05:57

And many millions of vaccines
could be made quickly.

06:00

They could also be
administered by yourself.

06:03

So the idea is to get a bandaid.

06:06

It looks like a bandaid you
buy it in the drug store.

06:08

It's shipped to you through Amazon

06:10

or UPS or some other shipping service.

06:12

You take it out of the package,

06:13

you put it on your hand like this,

06:15

and then you take the sticker off,

06:17

and, voila, you've been vaccinated.

06:19

So how is that possible?

06:21

Well, in this bandaid,

06:23

it has little tiny spicules,
little tiny needles,

06:27

and this was designed after a
snake viper fang bite, okay?

06:33

Or snake viper fangs.
So little snake bites.

06:37

Anyway, in these tiny little spicules,

06:40

they claim you won't
really feel it that much,

06:42

there's a, they're a little hydrogel.

06:45

It's a material called "HYDROGEL".

06:46

Inside the hydrogel would
be a "luciferase" enzyme,

06:51

as well as the vaccine itself.

06:54

Okay. So what is all that?

06:56

So first of all, you're
getting the vaccine.

06:58

It's modified RNA or modified DNA.

07:01

Let's take, Moderna, modified RNA.

07:04

So in that modified RNA,
the idea is that it would,

07:08

the microneedles would puncture

07:10

into your cell membrane, okay?

07:12

And this synthetic piece of an RNA,

07:16

it's a code for the part of the virus.

07:19

Or they could use a synthetic DNA to code

07:22

for the part of the virus,
would go into your nucleus.

07:25

Your body would start transcribing.

07:27

It would start reading it

07:29

and making more of that part of the virus.

07:32

Well, why would we want
to make more of the virus

07:34

or part of the virus?

07:35

The idea is your body would
get used to seeing it,

07:37

would know how to make antibodies

07:39

and would have an
improved T cell response.

07:41

And the idea is then when
you saw it in the future,

07:44

your body would already
know how to fight it,

07:46

and it would be a better response.

07:48

That's the idea.

07:50

The problem with that is
they're using something

07:53

called a process called TRANSFECTION,

07:55

and transfection is a way

07:58

that we make genetically
modified organisms.

08:01

Okay. I think you know about
those fruits and vegetables.

08:05

They're not as healthy

08:06

as the normal wild type
fruit and vegetables.

08:10

So possibly you could
extrapolate that to a human.

08:12

If we become genetically modified,

08:15

we would not be as healthy, okay?

08:17

We don't have longterm
studies on this, anyway.

08:19

It is unbelievable.

08:21

And, you know, the vaccine manufacturers

08:24

have made this statement.

08:25

This will not alter our DNA, our genome.

08:27

I say that is not true.

08:29

Because if we use this process

08:32

to make a genetically modified organism,

08:34

why would it not do the
same thing to a human?

08:38

I don't know why they're saying that.

08:40

Now, if you look at the
definition of transfection,

08:44

it'll tell you that it
can be a temporary change

08:48

in the cell, and I think

08:49

that's what the vaccine
manufacturers are banking on.

08:52

It's temporary,

08:53

or it's a possibility
for it to become stable,

08:57

to be taken up into the genome,

08:59

and so stable that it
will start replicating

09:01

when the genome replicates,

09:02

meaning it is now a permanent
part of your genome.

09:06

That's a chance that we're taking.

09:07

So it could be temporary
or it could be permanent.

09:10

And we would never know that

09:12

for years down the road, honestly.

09:15

So here we go.

09:17

We've got something that
can alter our genome.

09:21

It's a possibility.

09:22

And another thing on that.

09:24

If they're altering the genome,

09:27

what would be the effects?

09:28

I told you previously
some of the side effects,

09:30

but also we need to know

09:33

that this is a synthetic
piece of DNA or RNA, okay?

09:37

And if it becomes taken up
into the genome of a human,

09:42

it's synthetic, it's not from nature.

09:45

And if you look at the
Supreme Court Justice ruling

09:48

on synthetic DNA or genes,

09:52

it can be patented, and
patents have owners.

09:56

So what does that mean for us?

09:57

What if this gets into our genome?

09:59

Does that mean Moderna

10:01

or the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

10:04

or the Department of Defense,

10:06

all of these people who are
involved in the patents,

10:08

are they somehow going to
own part of our genome?

10:13

It's a possibility. You need to know that.

10:16

So that's one part of this
delivery system. Just one.

10:19

Now let me go to the next.

10:21

The next part of the delivery
system is a LUCIFERASE enzyme.

10:25

Okay. They named it.
They patented LUCIFERASE.

10:29

I don't like that name.

10:31

Luciferase: because it has
bioluminescent qualities.

10:35

Which means it can produce a
light or it has a light source.

10:40

And all of this would be under your skin,

10:42

and you cannot see it.

10:43

Now, the LUCIFERASE is an idea

10:46

because they want to make
sure that you're vaccinated.

10:48

They don't trust medical records.

10:50

They don't trust you saying
that you got vaccinated.

10:52

They want to make sure.

10:53

And they want to make
sure it was successful.

10:55

A say a successful transfection,

10:57

a successful gene modification.

11:00

So when you get the LUCIFERASE enzyme,

11:02

if you have an iPhone or a
special app on the iPhone,

11:06

you can scan over that area,

11:07

and it will give a digital code,

11:10

a digital imprint, a digital pattern,

11:12

something that will identify
that you were vaccinated.

11:15

It holds your vaccination record.

11:18

It also gives you an ID,

11:21

a number, a bar code, a branding,

11:24

whatever you want to call it, a tattoo.

11:26

It's all the same thing.

11:28

You now become like "a product".

11:31

So we have that.

11:33

Now the third thing I
mentioned was HYDROGEL.

11:36

So HYDROGEL is actually
an invention from DARPA,

11:41

the Department of Advanced
Research Projects Agency.

11:45

This is kind of a sci-fi kind of a group

11:49

from the Department of Defense,

11:50

Pentagon of the U.S. government.

11:53

They make these fantastic inventions.

11:56

So one of them is HYDROGEL.

11:59

HYDROGEL, you can Goo... I'm sorry.

12:01

You can YouTube. Look on YouTube.

12:03

Look at Profusa is one of the companies.

12:06

DARPA, as well as HYDROGEL.

12:08

And you'll find some
little two minute clips

12:10

that they describe.

12:12

So HYDROGEL's nanotechnology,
microscopic little robots,

12:15

and these little robots,
actually, I know it sounds crazy.

12:19

It's still crazy to me,
but it's possible, okay?

12:22

They can disassemble,
reassemble, assemble into

12:26

and make different things.

12:28

So with this HYDROGEL, it has,
it's really nanotechnology.

12:33

So that's something, you know, robotic

12:36

or something that's
artificial intelligence.

12:39

It has the ability to connect
with artificial intelligence.

12:42

So this means that a human
can now connect to directly

12:47

and gather information from our bodies

12:49

and gather it and connect
with your smartphone,

12:53

with the cloud, with
some other smart device.

12:57

And once this is done,
this is 24 hours a day,

13:00

seven days a week, 365 days a year.

13:04

Think about that.

13:06

Think about how immediately
that could change our privacy.

13:11

Immediately can change our autonomy.

13:13

Immediately change our freedoms.

13:17

This can gather data
like your blood sugar,

13:20

your oxygen, your blood pressure.

13:22

Okay, those sound great,

13:25

but it also can gather many other things.

13:28

It can gather, they say, your emotions

13:31

or your menstrual cycle, your activity,

13:35

if you've fallen, your
nutrients in your body,

13:38

if you took a medicines.

13:40

It's a potential to see if
you took a list of drugs.

13:42

It's got a potential
to see almost anything

13:44

that goes on in your body.

13:48

And all of this
information is going where?

13:51

That has not been addressed.

13:52

Who's protecting this information?

13:54

What are they using it for?

13:56

This is really serious stuff, guys.

13:58

This is all being
proposed of being unveiled

14:01

in the next vaccine, okay?

14:05

The other thing to know is
with this NANOTECHNOLOGY,

14:09

HYDROGEL, artificial
intelligence, you know, hookup,

14:13

just like your cell phone,
you can send a text message.

14:18

You can send an email, but
also you can receive them back.

14:22

So that means we could
receive information.

14:24

What information would
be coming back into us?

14:27

Would it affect our mood, our behavior?

14:31

Would it affect, you know, how we,

14:34

how we think or our memories?

14:37

If you haven't watched the movie "Matrix,"

14:39

I think you should.

14:40

I think there's some truths
in that, in that movie.

14:44

I see so many wrong
things with this vaccine,

14:48

and I see that we are not talking about it

14:51

in the major media.

14:53

And I see that.

14:55

I feel that these companies
are outright lying to us

14:58

when they say they can not affect our DNA.

15:01

Because by all definitions
that they are using,

15:05

this can affect our DNA.

15:12

So, guys, I wanted to
make this video short

15:14

because I wanted to get the point across.

15:16

I wanted you to really
do your own research.

15:21

So now that there are many
risks that we're seeing here,

15:23

and there is some,

15:25

we really need to know
if we really want to go

15:28

from "Human 1.0" to "Human 2.0".

15:31

And let me also tell you

15:33

that there's some major
names behind these vaccines.

15:37

You're always going to see

15:38

like the Department of Defense
from the U.S. government.

15:41

Sometimes DARPA, like I told you.

15:43

Why is the military
involved with our vaccines?

15:47

You see the Bill and
Melinda Gates Foundation

15:49

everywhere with this.

15:50

If you look, you'll find
that name almost always.

15:54

And let's go back to the Bill
and Melinda Gates Foundation.

15:57

I want you to look up what,
let's look at the track record.

16:01

Let's look at what the man stands for.

16:04

His family comes from
a family of EUGENICS.

16:07

What does EUGENICS mean?
Population control.

16:10

Meaning there's too many
people on the planet.

16:12

It's important to know.

16:14

He's been on video stating

16:16

that he thinks with a
very good new vaccine

16:20

we could get the Earth's population

16:22

to be decreased by 10 to 15%.

16:26

Well, who's going to stay
and who is going to go?

16:30

And who is he to decide?

16:32

He doesn't have a medical background,

16:33

no epidemiology background,

16:35

no science background background.

16:37

He's not a doctor. He's software tech.

16:40

That's what he has.

16:42

I'd also like you to realize,

16:44

I always look at who
has a vested interest.

16:48

What are their motivations?
What is his motivation, right?

16:51

Whereas we already know
his family background.

16:54

Well, what's greatly
concerning to me is that DARPA,

16:58

this military agency,

17:00

as well as the Bill and
Melinda Gates Foundation,

17:04

is very interested in something

17:05

called GENE DRIVE research or technology,

17:09

or GENE EXTINCTION technology,

17:13

and it's exactly what it sounds like.

17:16

By using genetic mutations,

17:19

by use of transfection, for instance,

17:23

you can exterminate an entire
species from the planet.

17:30

They are proposing to
use this for mosquitoes,

17:33

for instance, in Africa.

17:35

But, guys, our world is
a delicate ecosystem.

17:40

Who is saying one species goes?

17:43

You destroy one species,

17:45

you could affect an entire ecosystem.

17:47

So when you exterminate an entire species,

17:52

you will affect an entire ecosystem.

17:54

It's a very delicate balance.

17:56

And who's to say who's going
to stay and who's going to go?

17:59

Who's got that knowledge? Why
aren't we talking about this?

18:02

And, guys, if we can do it to an insect,

18:04

we can do it to an animal.

18:05

We can do it to a human.

18:08

I bring this up because

18:10

if these agencies that
are behind the vaccine

18:12

also stand for that, do you
trust them with your health?

18:17

Do you trust them with your family?

18:18

Do you trust them with our children?

18:22

The other thing is we're
rushing this to production.

18:25

What is the motivation behind that?

18:28

We need to really think about this.

18:33

I've also stated in the past

18:35

that we need to know that there are,

18:39

at least in the United States,

18:41

there are mandates passed

18:42

that make the vaccine
manufacturers have no liability,

18:47

zero liability for any
harm done to any human.

18:51

If people are killed, if they're
hurt, if they're paralyzed,

18:54

if they're maimed for
life, it doesn't matter.

18:57

You have no recourse, and they
still make all their profit.

19:02

So there's no incentive for
them to make it safe, anyway.

19:07

Also want you to know
that one of the mandates,

19:09

the Emergency Preparedness Act,

19:11

that says they can force a vaccine on us.

19:15

They cannot force a vaccine

19:18

if there is a viable
treatment for the COVID-19.

19:23

And I want you to know that
doctors around the world

19:25

are being censored about treatment options

19:27

for COVID-19 or prevention for COVID-19.

19:33

Because if there's a true
treatment or prevention,

19:36

then they can't force this vaccine on us.

19:39

I want to bring that up
because what in the world

19:41

is the motivation of doing this?

19:44

Is it really in the health of all of us?

19:47

As a doctor, I can't see

19:49

how this is in the true
health of the entire world.

19:51

I think there's another motive,
another agenda going on.

19:55

The more I look at this,
the more that comes up.

20:00

So I'll leave you with this.

20:01

I want you to make this short and sweet

20:05

so that you can digest
this and think about it.

20:10

Do you really want to go to "Human 2.0"?

20:13

I don't think it's the
fantasy you see in the movies.

20:20

We need to come together,

20:23

and we need a unify our voices

20:26

because people in positions of power

20:29

taking care of our health
are not in our best interest.

20:34

But together we have power.

20:36

Together, united our voice is strong.

20:40

So I encourage you to
do critical thinking.

20:42

Do your own research.

20:45

Join groups in your state.

20:46

Go your state legislature,
and you tell them no.

20:50

No to these experiments on humans.

20:54

No to invasion of
privacy. No to censorship.

21:00

We are sovereign human souls,

21:02

and we need to take our rights back.

21:06

Thank you for listening.

21:07

And you know, I always say my videos

21:10

with the greatest of love
and the greatest of peace.

21:14

Thank you.