Saturday, September 3, 2022

Palliative Care Doctor Reveals What Most People Say Before They Die

....

 

with transcript 

Hospice doctors can offer a unique insight  into what it's like right before you die.  
For healthcare professionals who  
work in the field of palliative and hospice care,  providing support for terminally ill patients can  
give a rare insight into questions many of us face  when contemplating life and our own mortality.  
Now, in an exclusive interview with Health  Digest, Dr. Simran Malhotra — a triple board  
certified physician in internal medicine, hospice  and palliative care doctor, and lifestyle medicine  
coach — shares firsthand how her patients have  influenced the way she leads her own life in hopes  
it will inspire others to do the same. Dr. Malhotra details why she became  
so passionate about this line of work: "I remember one of my very first rotations  
during my internal medicine residency was in the  ICU and I just felt so much for the patients and  
their families because I felt like they didn't get  enough time and attention from the medical team.”  
“And so for me, when I did my first palliative  care rotation, I got to sit down with a family,  
I got to understand what their goals were,  what their hopes were, what their worries were,  
and it really allowed me to get in with them  in their experience and try to provide the most  
personalized and compassionate care possible."
When it comes to regrets, Dr.  Malhotra asks patients about what  
holds personal meaning in their lives. "I have thousands of patient stories  
from my experience, and if you ask someone else  that does what I do, we could probably narrow  
it down to three common themes or three  common regrets that most people have."  
One of the three common regrets most  frequently voiced by patients was not  
spending more time with loved ones, including  years lost due to a trivial disagreement.  
"I've had so many patients share that specific  regret of like, I wish I didn't lose 10 years of  
talking to my daughter or my son over whatever  the issue was, that's a very common one."  
Another common regret was working too  much. She points out that in the U.S.,  
success is so often linked to productivity that it  drives us to dedicate much of our time to work.  
"When you're working all the time, that means  you're missing out on that time with your  
loved ones or your family and yourself." Lastly, she has found that patients' third  
most common regret was a lack of courage  to pursue their passions and desires.  
"...we don't want to let people down, especially  when it comes to our parents. And there's a lot of  
cultural things that tie into this and everything,  but that is probably one of the biggest ones,  
like I wish I had done X, Y, or Z for myself." She goes on to explain that while her patients can  
have such unique personal stories, the regrets,  in the end, wind up being much the same.  
"In my several years of practice now,  if my patients are able to talk to me,  
there's two things that I always ask them in  my encounters and that is, what brings you joy,  
and then what's most important to you? And from  these questions, everyone shares their answers  
but then eventually it leads to this conversation  about the things they wish they had done."
Dr. Malhotra says there is a lot we can  learn from patients' lived experiences,  
including taking better care  of ourselves while we’re alive.  
One thing she frequently hears patients talk  about is the lack of care they had for themselves,  
which is becoming a more common  problem in the modern era.  
"People are getting sicker at a younger age. And  so before when we used to think about end of life,  
we were thinking about our 70s and  80s and 90s, but now it's not uncommon  
for us to be seen and caring for people  much younger at the end of life.”
Although fear, anxiety, and sadness are among  the most common emotions Dr. Malhotra sees  
patients experience before they pass,  she says hope is the most predominant.  
Many communicate their fear of the unknown,  concerns about their families, anxiety about  
potential pain they may experience, and sadness  around leaving the world and their loved ones  
behind. But many others feel a sense of peace. "I've kind of witnessed over and over again that  
there's this dance between what people hope  for desperately and what they fear the most,  
so it's like this dance between life and death." Fear of the unknown may also be a very challenging  
emotion for most — particularly  if they don’t practice religion.  
"When you get into religious  and spiritual beliefs, there are  
thoughts about what is coming, but for many  people, if they're not religious, they don't  
know, and so there's a lot of uncertainty  of dying and not knowing what's coming."  
Someone’s age and life stage can also play a  role in how much anxiety they experience.  
"There's a lot of anxiety specifically for our  younger patients who might have young families,  
young children. There's a lot of anxiety around  what's going to happen to my children if I'm gone,  
who's going to raise my children?” Being a palliative care doctor has  
given Dr. Malhotra a rare opportunity  to see both courage and vulnerability  
in her patients and their families. “All of these really difficult emotions that most  
of us I think have been taught by society to keep  in, right? When they don't share them openly but  
near the last several hours to days to weeks to  months of life these are things that you see in  
the hospital setting, or in the hospice setting.” “Most people share that they want to be home,  
they want to be without pain, and they  want to be with the people that they love,  
they want that certainty.”
While our material possessions may be very  
important to us in the present, Dr.  Malhotra shares that it's not often  
what patients feel most proud of at the end of  their lives. However, items that hold personal  
significance might begin to take on new meaning  as death approaches, such as written letters.  
Dr. Malhotra promotes the idea of "legacy  work," or finding ways to leave parts of  
ourselves behind for our loved ones  — especially for younger patients.  
"...write out birthday cards for their kids  until the age of 10 or 15 or record videos,  
especially nowadays with iPhones and tablets, it's  very easy to keep those things for a long time,  
or create ways to feel like they're,  one, in control of being able to share  
the things that are most meaningful to them.  And number two, that they won't be forgotten,  
that they're leaving behind something if  they don't have the time to live that life."
Dr. Malhotra tells us patients often take  the most pride in personal relationships,  
milestones, or accomplishments  towards the end of their lives.  
"It's always about their relationships or  about how they're so proud of their children  
or their great-grandchildren or the things that  they're doing with their life and their education  
and the things that they've accomplished." When taking stock of what we're most proud of,  
Dr. Malhotra suggests posing a series  of guiding questions to ourselves,  
known as the rocking chair test. "When I'm 90 years old and I'm sitting  
in that rocking chair looking back on my  life, what would I have wanted to accomplish  
and what would I be most proud of?" Dr. Malhotra states that the rocking  
chair test can help bring clarity when we're  feeling conflicted in our day-to-day lives as  
to what ultimately matters most.
As a patient nears death, Dr. Malhotra  says that their final words often  
vary based on a sense of fulfillment. "I found that my elderly patients will often  
share things like, I'm at peace or I've lived  a good life. Whereas, for my younger patients,  
they never, at least from what I can remember,  I haven't really had any patients that have  
shared openly any specific words. It really  comes down to like, I'm not ready to die,  
I have so much more living to do." Dr. Malhotra also suggests that  
while each person may wish to share what’s  uniquely individual to them, there are common  
expressions when the end is near. "When we're talking about the last  
hours to days, I think one thing that I make  certain to share with my patients and families  
is to share the very simple things I think  that matter most, right? Like I love you,  
please forgive me. I forgive  you. Thank you. I'm sorry.  
And oftentimes, when I'm telling this to a patient  or family, you can just see tears streaming down  
because these are some of the most meaningful  when said with intention, words that we can  
share with someone that we love."
It's not just the words of our dying loved ones  that are important and meaningful. In fact,  
the words we say to those who are departing  are just as important. Amid grief, it can be  
so challenging to find exactly the right words. "Oftentimes when you're at that point, sometimes  
you just don't know what to say. You're at loss  of words, right? And you just kind of, a lot of  
times people are thinking ‘I wish this wasn't  happening’ instead of thinking about the things  
that they do want to say with their loved ones." Dr. Malhotra explains it’s important to understand  
that just because a patient isn’t alert  doesn’t mean they can’t hear. She recommends,  
"Share the things that you want them to know  because hearing is often the last sense to go."  
The same holds true in reverse as well, she  says. You wouldn’t want to say anything you  
wouldn't want them to know or hear.
As a palliative doctor, she’s found  deep connections and community,  
particularly when it comes  to her own health risks.  
"I've cared for a lot of women at  the end of life, a lot of young women  
who have had the same genetic mutation as  I do. I carry the BRCA1 genetic mutation.  
For those that are not familiar with  it, it's the Angelina Jolie mutation.  
And it radically increases your lifetime  risk of breast and ovarian cancer."  
Some of her patients shared impactful words with  her on their deathbeds. One patient told her,  
“This doesn’t have to be you,” which  changed the entire trajectory of her life.  
It empowered her to take the extra initiative  to care for herself and get the answers she  
wasn’t getting from her medical team. In addition to living a healthy life,  
Dr. Malhotra’s patients have inspired her  to live her life with intentionality.  
"Since the pandemic I've been doing so  much inner work, I've been trying to  
figure out what's most important to me, I've  really, really started focusing on forgiveness  
and mending my relationships that  were not where I wanted them to be."  
When it comes to living fully, she  encourages individuals to share their  
stories and to find strength in a community  of people that inspires and uplifts them.  
"I know that every day I wake up, it's a gift, and  every day I wake up, I can create the life that  
I want to create. And if you ever feel like you  can't just know that this life that we're given  

 

Thursday, September 1, 2022

#ArriveCAN app Use of Technology to Fight COVID-19 Date: May 8, 2020 Classification: Unclassified

 Bloggers Note: I am told the the TRUDEAU-FORD-LEGAULT TRIO...plan to legislate this FALL #ArriveCan application to digitize world travelers ....first then all of us .... and here is a lil fear mongering ...the environment social credit movement come along with it... Trudeau want to impeach any further government to undo this TRAP a Citizen scheme ..


 

Use of Technology to Fight COVID-19

Date: May 8, 2020
Classification: Unclassified
Fully releasable (ATIP)? Yes
Branch / Agency: PS/NCSB

Issue: Media coverage on the use of technology such as cellphones and the efforts of both the federal and provincial health officials’ in recruiting people (e.g. retired staff, medical students) to increase capacity for contact tracing and fight the spread of COVID 19 in Canada.

Proposed Response:

  • I can assure Canadians that we are leveraging the mandates and authorities of all relevant agencies to ensure that the Government has the advice it needs to make decisions on our approach to managing the COVID-19 crisis.
  • The Canadian Security Intelligence Service has no mandate or legal authority to support the Public Health Agency of Canada’s data collection or analysis efforts to track the impact of the pandemic. However, as part of its contribution to the whole-of-government response, the Service has offered general advice from data science experts.
  • The Canada Border Services Agency has been working with the Public Health Agency of Canada on developing a mobile application, ArriveCAN, that would serve as an encouraged alternative to the paper COVID-19 contact tracing form.
  • ArriveCan provides an opportunity to reduce points of contact at ports of entry and improve onerous manual process with data automation.

Background:

Canada is in its first wave of infections of the COVID 19 pandemic. It has implemented a series of measures including the closing of non-essential services, social-distancing, border closures; and mass testing.

Summary of Media Coverage on the use of technology
In an April 10 article titled Canada looking to prepare ‘surge’ force, use cellphone data to contain COVID 19, the National Post outlines federal and provincial health officials’ efforts to recruit people to increase capacity and explore technological options such as the use of cellphone data for contact tracing. The article notes that actions are being taken by both provincial and federal health officials to strengthen capacity and contact tracing in Canada. For example, provinces are recruiting medical students and retired health workers while the federal government is creating a national inventory database for provinces to use if needed. The federal government is also creating a “surge capacity” of staff ready to be deployed, as needed, in regions with a new outbreak.

On the technological front, various media articles cover the role technology could play in contact tracing and discussions being held among health officials on the best course of action domestically. The use of cellphone location data is one of the main topics of the discussion.

The discussion on the use of technology to fight COVID-19 has garnered a debate amid privacy experts and civil liberties advocates in Canada. Concerns raised as part the debate on the use of technology include privacy rights, limits on data retention and use, voluntary use, and consent.

According to the Guardian (Apr. 20, 2020), a group of nearly 300 scientists and researchers from 26 countries issued an open letter in which they stated that the success of contact tracing via technology will depend on such technology built specifically to respect user privacy. They argue that without this safeguard, use of this technology could result in the surveillance of the public by governments and the private sector. They also warned that contact tracing would fail if people do not install the software on their phone because of mistrust regarding how their data will be used. These concerns are raised in a number of international and domestic media outlets including the National Post (Apr. 1, & 10, 2020), Globe and Mail (Apr. 9 & 20, 2020), Financial Post (Apr. 14, 2010), and CBC (Apr. 17, 2020).

In Canada, media coverage on contact tracing is generally limited to the use of social media platforms in relation to privacy and civil liberties concerns rather than the role of security and intelligence agencies.

Security and intelligence
Canada’s national security and intelligence (NSI) community has been engaged on COVID 19 since its first emergence. As stated by the Prime Minister, the Government “had meetings of the incident response group as of late January to talk about the COVID-19 potential threat. We were well coordinated with our Five Eyes allies and other intelligence services around the world and being aware of this potential challenge on the horizon and were dealing with it as of the end of January.”

The NSI community, where possible, supports the efforts of public health officials by leveraging its various mandates and authorities and contributes in other significant ways where mandates and authorities do not permit direct involvement. For example, while the mandate of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) to investigate threats to the security of Canada (e.g. espionage and sabotage, terrorism, and subversion) does not permit it to support the Public Health agency of Canada’s data collection or analysis efforts to track the impact of the COVID 19, it has been providing general expertise to them on data analytics as part of the whole-of-government response to the pandemic.

The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), in collaboration with the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), has developed in-house a mobile application, ArriveCAN, to support the collection of contact tracing information for PHAC’s enforcement of the Quarantine Act. The CBSA, on behalf of PHAC, is responsible for developing the ArriveCAN App, collecting, storing and reporting on the data. PHAC is responsible for the overall project delivery and implementation. ArriveCAN serves as an encouraged alternative to the current COVID-19 paper contact tracing form used at ports of entry and is available on the Google Play and Apple Stores. Information collected under PHAC’s contact tracing form (Covid-19 Form) includes tombstone data, such as flight, traveller, and isolation address details.

The ArriveCAN app cannot be used to track people’s location automatically through their phone or via GPS, nor is it a surveillance tool. The protection of Canadians’ information is a priority for the Government of Canada, and any tool used to collect personal information undergoes a rigorous privacy assessment.

In order to test ArriveCAN on the ground, a soft launch took place on April 22, 2020 at two ports of entry in British Columbia: Vancouver International Airport (YVR) and Peace Arch Border Crossing (Douglas), with a national roll-out planned for April 29th.

The national security and intelligence community is engaged with Five Eyes allies and other intelligence partners to better understand state and regional responses to the pandemic in order to contribute to a more complete global picture and inform Canada’s response. The community also remains focused on threats that may be heightened during the pandemic, including to economic security interests and from the spread of misinformation.

The security and intelligence community will continue to identify ways in which it can contribute meaningfully to the whole-of-government response to the pandemic.

Federal funding coverage
On April 23rd, the Prime Minister committed over $1 billion for a national medical and research strategy, which includes vaccine development, the production of treatments, and tracking to address COVID 19. Of this fund, CTV News reported that:

  • $350 million will be dedicated for national testing, modelling, data-monitoring and tracking of COVID-19;
  • $662 million for research on how brain and airway cells are affected, as well as for clinical trials, including one trial that will “evaluate safety of a potential cell therapy to reduce the impacts and severity of acute respiratory distress associated with COVID-19; and
  • $115 million for research on the development of vaccines and treatments in Canada.

Joint Statement of Federal, Provincial and Territorial Privacy Commissioners
On May 7, 2020, federal, provincial and territorial (FPT) privacy commissioners issued a joint statement outlining privacy principles for contact tracing and similar apps. The commissioners acknowledge that the significant challenge of limiting the spread of the virus is prompting governments and public health authorities to consider leveraging personal information to manage the threat. Noting that while privacy laws must be upheld, some do not provide an effective level of protection suited to the digital environment, the commissioners call on FPT governments to make participation voluntary and contingent on informed consent; establish a clear legal basis to proposed measures; ensure that measures are necessary and proportional to the circumstances and that personal information is used only for its intended public health purpose; use de-identified data wherever possible; place time limitations and data destruction obligations on proposed measures; and be transparent and accountable about how apps work and what’s being done with personal information.

Contacts:
Prepared by: NSPD
Approved by: Dominic Rochon, Senior Assistant Deputy Minister, National and Cyber Security Branch, 613-990-4976