Wednesday, August 17, 2022
Unlocking the potential of digital identity for secure and seamless travel
Bloggers note: BE INFORMED and foresee the world tomorrow if you will ...END THE Slaverish ArriveCAN system PETITION HERE https://ktdi.org/
Unlocking the potential of
digital identity for secure
and seamless travel
Pilot Partners
About
The Known Traveller Digital Identity, or KTDI, is a World Economic Forum initiative that brings together a global consortium of individuals, governments, authorities and the travel industry to enhance security in world travel.
The first global collaboration of its kind, KTDI enables more secure and more seamless travel that benefits both travellers and the travel industry.
KTDI enables consortium partners to access verifiable claims of a traveller’s identity data so they can assess their credibility, optimise passenger processing and reduce risk.
KTDI allows individuals to manage their own profile and collect digital ‘attestations’ of their personal data, deciding what data to share and when.
The more attestations a traveller accumulates and shares, the better consortium partners, governments and other parties can provide a smooth and safe travel experience.
FAQ
Trudeau"s ArriveCAN SCAM Jammed in constitutional frame work
See Dr Leslyn Lewis article : https://leslynlewis.ca/blog/arrivecan-might-be-illegal/
SEE ALSO https://ktdi.org/
ArriveCAN might be illegal
We are currently living in a situation where Canadians are not free to enter their own country without completing a form that currently has no legal basis to exist.
Worse, Canadians are being fined and threatened at their own border for not submitting private medical information that the government has no right to demand.
While the term medical tyranny is mocked by some, it is a fair description of a government that refuses to follow their own law or even the mobility rights enshrined in our Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The mandatory use of the ArriveCAN App, while always suspect, now seems completely unjustified in light of the fact that emergency orders have now been lifted. But our government insists in maintaining a quasi-emergency status in order to continue to justify this failed and potentially illegal experiment.
The ArriveCan App is Canada’s travel monitoring response to the World Health Organization’s declaration of Covid-19 as a global pandemic. ArriveCan’s “Privacy Notice” clearly states that it collects personal information in accordance with the Privacy Act. While government officials and border agents pretend that it is mandatory, the truth is that its use should be relegated solely to Emergency Orders and measures taken under the Quarantine Act. If emergency powers are not invoked, I believe there is absolutely no legal grounds upon which a charge can be upheld for non-compliance with the App.The two circumstances where a Canadian needs to disclose their medical status upon entry are if there’s an emergency order in place requiring the mandatory disclosure of private medical information, or if there are grounds according to section 19(1), where a health assessment can only be requested based on reasonable or probable grounds “that the traveller has or might have a communicable disease or is infested with vectors, or has recently been in close proximity to a person who has or might have a communicable disease…”
Also, the traveller cannot be subjected to any examination that involves “the entry into the traveller’s body of any instrument or other foreign body.” According to this definition, the health assessment should largely be a discussion of any existing symptoms (section 14(1).
Perhaps the most disturbing thing about the App is that your information could be shared with “international health organizations as well as their institutions”:
“Personal information may be disclosed to contractors working for the Public Health Agency of Canada and Service Canada as well as to the following entities: other government institutions, as well as provincial, territorial, municipal governments or international health organizations as well as their institutions for these purposes.” [Emphasis added]
Knowing that our government has already taken part in the WEF’s Known Traveller Digital ID Program (KTDI), many Canadians are concerned about where this program is headed and what information Justin Trudeau is already sharing with groups like the WEF and other international organizations?
Conclusion
There are many reasons to insist on the immediate elimination of the ArriveCAN App.
Firstly, there is no quantifiable emergency that makes it mandatory under the Quarantine Act.
Secondly, Canadians have a constitutional right to enter their own country by showing a valid passport to border agents. Any interference with that right must be substantiated. Simply saying “It helps”, is not proof.
Thirdly, Canadians have not yet been properly informed about the Known Traveller Digital ID Program, how ArriveCAN relates to this program and to which international organizations and institutions the information of Canadians is being submitted.
Finally, it is very likely that the fines for non-compliance with downloading the App are a form of harassment and have no legal form or effect. I have been unable to find any precedent in a court of law where the courts have found guilty a healthy person under the Quarantine Act. Even more elusive are precedents under the same Act or the Contraventions Act, where governments insist on national quarantine policies where no emergency exists.
The continued mandatory use of the ArriveCAN App and the fines being levied against Canadians who refuse its use amount to governmental bullying and harassment.
The App’s privacy statement makes it clear that its mandatory nature can only be enforced during an emergency.
So I repeat, we currently are under no emergency measures. Therefore the mandatory requirement for the App is an infringement on our freedoms and constitutional rights.
Section 4 of the Quarantine Act states that it is invoked to take comprehensive measures to protect the public. Where is the data to support these comprehensive measures and the use of the App?
I have made a petition to demand the government end this experiment, respect the privacy and rights of its citizen and cease their medical tyranny.
Will you support my fight?
Sunday, August 7, 2022
China suspends dialogue with US.What does this mean for Canada? #alleyesonchina
China suspends dialogue with US.What does this mean for Canada? – Nationwide
China announced on Friday that it would suspend dialogue with the United States in many areas in response to US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s recent visit to Taiwan.
Not only has the dialogue on climate change and dialogue between military commanders at the theater level ceased, but so has the cross-border exchange of crime and drug trafficking.
read more:
China suspends talks with US, imposes sanctions on Pelosi over Taiwan visit
With such an “opaque” administration, it will be difficult to predict the future of Canada’s diplomatic relations with China, said Josephine Chuduke, professor of Asian Studies at the University of British Columbia (UBC).
“I never thought the Chinese regime would act in such a fierce and violent way,” she told Global News.
As for Canada, “the Chinese system is so opaque that you can’t really predict what China will do,” she said. “Long-term, we don’t know what other actions China will take.”
But at least for now, Chiu-Duke is not calling for a change in relations between Canada and the People’s Republic of China.
“At the moment, we do not see any particular change in course regarding Canada’s relationship with the People’s Republic of China,” she said.
The country’s communist government also announced sanctions against Pelosi and her family after China’s allegations of “vicious” and “provocative” behavior during her visit to Taiwan earlier this week.
Additionally, China has launched ballistic missiles near Taiwan in a major military exercise.
“I think it’s important for China to understand that its actions are irresponsible,” André Laliberte, a professor of political science at the University of Ottawa, told Global News.
“And I think Canada must adamantly say that it is unacceptable. Frankly, I think it is the right of the Canadian government to say that China’s actions are irresponsible,” he said, adding that Canada is an ally. He also mentioned the importance of maintaining close ties with
read more:
US-China diplomatic tensions cast doubt on progress on global climate change
Relations between the United States and China have always been closely watched by Canada, Margaret McAig-Johnston, a senior fellow in the School of Public and International Relations at the University of Ottawa, told Global News. She called the suspension of dialogue a “huge overreaction.”
Going forward, Canada will need to develop a comprehensive plan to regulate its ties with both China and Taiwan, McAig-Johnston said.
“We need to describe the more aggressive new China we are witnessing, identify how the government will manage that relationship, and explain how it will work with Taiwan to help. An Indo-Pacific strategy will shape our relations with China, Taiwan and other countries in the region.”
Charles Burton, a senior fellow at the Macdonald Laurier Institute and former counselor at the Canadian Embassy in China, would like to see an Indo-Pacific policy aligned with European allies, as well as Australia and the United States.
“We need to put this issue on the government’s agenda, make some decisions, and articulate Canada’s position on Taiwan’s defense and China’s activities,” he told Global News.
Canada’s voice in China is currently “silent,” according to Burton, as there has been no Canadian ambassador to Beijing since he left Beijing last December.
“We really need someone at the ambassadorial level in terms of gaining access to the Chinese regime and being taken seriously,” he said.
read more:
Taiwan says Chinese military exercises appear to simulate attack on autonomous island
On Friday, China’s foreign ministry summoned Beijing-based Canadian diplomat Jim Nickel over Canada’s participation in reaffirming the country’s commitment to maintaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait and beyond. said he did.
A statement on behalf of G7 foreign ministers was issued on Wednesday outlining concerns over recent “threatening actions by the People’s Republic of China, particularly live-fire exercises and economic coercion at risk of unnecessary escalation.”
“Using the visit as a pretext for aggressive military activity in the Taiwan Strait is not justified,” the statement said.
Shortly after, Nickel was subpoenaed on Thursday by China’s Vice Foreign Minister Xie Feng, urging Canada to “immediately correct its mistakes” or “bear all consequences” on the Taiwan issue, China’s foreign ministry said in a statement released on Friday. said in
“Any conspiracy to tolerate and support separatist forces for ‘Taiwan independence’ is doomed to failure,” the statement said.
“Any consequences to be drawn from this G7 statement will not only undermine China’s relationship with the G7 countries, but will also harm China itself,” UBC’s Chiu-Duke said, adding that countries like Canada, including wheat You mentioned that you have access to products and food from
“Canada has always claimed to stand for liberal democracy and human rights, so the fact that the Foreign Minister has issued that statement along with the rest of the G7 countries already demonstrates our firm commitment to these kinds of principles. should not give in to bullies,” she said.
Relations between Canada and China have had a dark past. In December 2018, at the request of the United States, Canada arrested Meng Wanzhou, a senior executive at his Chinese company Huawei Technologies. Wanshu was indicted in connection with US sanctions against Iran.
Two Canadians working in China, Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, were detained after her arrest in late 2018. In 2021, a closed Chinese court convicted both of them on espionage charges. The Michaels were allowed to return home by the Chinese government on September 25 after the United States signed a deferred prosecution agreement in Meng’s case, allowing Meng’s release.
“The abduction of the two Michaels is still a very bitter memory for many people,” said Laliberte.
read more:
China lashes out at Pelosi visit, but experts say Taiwanese are ‘excited’
Earlier this year, Canada’s Minister of International Trade, Mary Ng, met with Taiwan’s Minister John Deng.
During the meeting, the two sides agreed to begin discussions on possible foreign investment promotion and protection arrangements between Canada and Taiwan, Canada’s sixth largest trading partner in Asia.
“It’s at a very high level. I think it shows Canada’s support for democracy,” said McQueigue-Johnston, adding that the Canadian ship had a strong diplomatic team in the Taiwan Strait and Taipei. Mentioned being sent through.
“I think it must be clear to Canadians that we have to stand with our allies. Canada has to stay strong. We have to stand up to this kind of rhetoric and bullying.” I won’t,” she said.
— Using files from Global News’ Saba Aziz, Reuters and The Canadian Press