Monday, February 2, 2026

WORTH the read><>,>, Stephen Harper and Jean Chrétien discuss Canada and the world

.

A)  EXTRACT FROM JEAN CHRETIEN ON PARLIAMENT DEBATES  

 B) EXTRACT FROM STEPHEN HARPER ABOUT COMMUNICATIONS 

A) EXTRACT FROM JEAN CHRETIEN ON PARLIAMENT DEBATES  

 

 the two of you clearly like and respect one another. I know you've got a bit of a road show you you uh you've embarked
upon from time to time and and despite the fact that you represent very different social and political
movements. Um what advice do you have for the current generation of political figures to enable them to disagree with
one another without stoking polarization in the country?
You know the communication of today have changed
and the gossips of the taverns you read them every morning on this little
machine and all that is terribly negative terribly negative and I don't know how
we will counter that because you have an article and only the people who are
negative very rarely you can be something under an article that refer to
what is positive in the article. It's always what can be negative. And so that
means that the young people have that in their head all the time and looking at that stuff a lot of time it was pure
invention lies and nobody correct them and that will have to be corrected. I
don't know. But I've I lived the same situation in a way. When I was elected
parliament, we had no TV, no radio, no nothing. It was a debating society
and there was a lot more, you know, now it's on TV. So it's done because, you know, they
read a text prepared by somebody else. The House of Commons in my time, you have not the time to have notes, the
right to have notes. If you could not speak up your mind, you could not talk. And if you lie, my that Trump would be
in trouble. If you lied in House of Commons and you
could not prove, you know, and then somebody accuse you of lying. If you cannot prove it, he was
expelled of the House of Congress. And all these things this values of what
is the truth seem to be have disappeared. They all look with what attract attention
what is attractive for the media and the communication of today and we'll have to
overcome that but we have overcome the era radio TV
television in the house and all that. So eventually we'll find a solution. Probably I will not be there to find it.

 

 B)  EXTRACT FROM STEPHEN HARPER ABOUT COMMUNICATIONS 

is the truth seem to be have disappeared. They all look with what attract attention
what is attractive for the media and the communication of today and we'll have to
overcome that but we have overcome the era radio TV
television in the house and all that. So eventually we'll find a solution. Probably I will not be there to find it.
Yeah, look, I I I do think this is part of the challenge we're we're entering a different age of communications, social
media age. You know, we've gone through I tell you know, 75 years ago, however
long it was, 150 years ago, uh when Sir John A. Macdonald was going across the
country. He was stumping like he originally not even a train or horse and buggy went from town to town, got in a
park on a stump or a gazebo. And that's how he built a political campaign and built a political machine. And then we
had the radio age and we had the TV age and we had the 24-hour news cycle which
happened in your time and then social media was just really getting a getting
a a whole a momentum just near the end of my time and it it's changed everything because it's a whole new mode
of communications and um and you know it's it's a it's a new challenge for a
new generation to master that and I I agree I think there's advantages, there's disadvantages. Look, I I just think that
somehow uh you know, the next generation has to be able to to combine mastery of
the new modes of communication with with the kind of mature lessons of political leadership. And you know, I'd say one of
those is doesn't matter whether you're in government or opposition, you always need to be asking yourself if it's a
policy or a case of opposition, if it's a statement, you know, not just is it popular today,
but how's it going to look for you in a month or a year or in five years time? You've got to you can't be drawn into
the moment of the of the X tweet, you know? You've got to you've got to think
longer term and and there are times and you got to pick your battles, right?
Whether you're government or opposition, there are times like now where, you know, you have to decide we're not going
to fight about that. We'll fight about something. You always need to be fighting about something because the public needs to be given choices. But on
big things like, you know, Canadian sovereignty, you need to work together and the there's times where the
opposition needs to support the government and the opposition needs to know that if it does that, the government is not going to exploit that
to disadvantage the opposition. So there are times where you've got to use better judgment.
Now you I guess you voted for the cleric act, don't you? I I did. I not only did I put
You talk to me about it. I put the first draft of it in parliament.
show a bit of humility. [laughter] No, no, but no, no, but on that, you
know, he was in the opposition and he supported me, you know, and there was some problem with that probably for
him, not for me and but it is something that nobody remembered now. Nobody talks
about it. You know, if you read it, it's not only a vote. The question has to be
approved by parliament of Canada and if you want to separate there is a series of step that you to have followed that
are very complicated. So don't be think that because one night there will be a
vote there will be a a vote to go there's a lot of step that have to be
follow because before this thing happened and it is because we decided that at that time why because some
people were claiming that we won't vote we will lose Canada remember that I
remember I said that makes no sense you know one of my friend in forget his glasses home and I would not be a
candidate the day after because he would have voted. And those who were telling that one vote was enough. I used to make
the joke uh that uh you know
the NDP I don't want to talk politics. It's a reality.
Their name is an illegal name. They call themselves the New Democratic
Party since 70 years. So it's not new at all. So it's false advertising
and they wanted to change their name one day at the annual meeting and they
failed. You know why? Because they didn't have twothirds of the vote. So they were willing to let go the country
for one vote and not get another name. Then any lane they needed twothirds of
the vote. Just you know relax. Canada is there for a long time.
Thank you. [applause]

 

TRANSCRIPT FROM 

Welcome to the Royal Canadian Geographical Society's gold medal ceremony to honor the right
honorable Steven Harper for his lifelong commitment and dedication to Canada. Congratulations.
[applause] [applause]
This ceremony is taking place on the occasion of the 20th anniversary of Mr. Harper's election as prime minister in
2006. Welcome back to Ottawa and to you, Mrs. Harper, and your family. It's so
good to have you back in Ottawa. We're really really pleased.
Mr. Harper, you guys are really good friends. We hear
[applause] [applause]
Mr. Cretchen is a fellow of the RCGS and he received the gold medal in 2022 and
so we're very very happy that you could join us. Thank you to Elder Codec Commander and the national chief of the
AFN Cindy Woodhouse for being with us as well as many friends from the diplomatic community and many current and former
parliamentarians. I've seen many of you today. It's so ha so great to have so many people from the hill and of course
our board president, the former leftenant governor of Alberta, Lois Mitchell. Wonderful to see you. Lois is
going to be presenting the gold medal in just a few minutes and of course many of our board members are here. Before we
begin, I'd like to welcome everybody to the traditional unseated territory of the Anishabi Algangquin people. Our
headquarters are at the confluence of three rivers uh a spiritual place for indigenous peoples for uh since time in
memorial.
We also have the mayor of Ottawa here. Thank you for coming. [applause]
So, I have to put a plug in. When you when you leave this ceremony today, you'll see cards upstairs and it's for
the True North Strong Fund. And today, uh, we're making a little announcement. We have started and established a fund
in the names of the right honorable Steven Harper and the right honorable Jean Kletchan called the true north
strong fund that will help the Royal Canadian Geographical Society promote Canadian identity, sovereignty and
unity. And we think those three things are really important right now. [applause]
[applause] And thanks to some early donors, we've already received $30,000 for this fund.
Pretty good. [applause] Thank you. So, as you depart today, we we'll have a
reception upstairs. The cards are right up at the reception desk. So, we encourage you to just take that little QR code and and give what you can to the
RCGS. So, we are living at a time when we really need to bring the best minds of
this country together for the betterment of the country. So in that spirit, please rise for the singing of God Save
the King and O Canada.
[music] [music]
[music] You will
[music] [music]
[music]
[music] for
[music] all
[music]
[music]
We send our [music] God for thee.
Glorious and free.
[music] I stand
by
the wee.
[applause] So 20 years ago on January 23rd, 2006 in
Calgary on a campaign stage as the election results were pouring in,
Calgary West MP and the leader of the newly emerged Conservative Party of Canada, Steven Harper, became prime
minister, Steven Harper, after winning one of the longest election campaigns in history. I remember it. went on and on
and on, lasting eight weeks over both Christmas and New Year's holidays. How
can we forget it? Two days later, I was standing on the Harper's Driveway in
Ottawa doing a television standup as the deputy bureau chief of CTV when an RCMP
officer waved at me and asked me if I'd like to go inside Stoay to say hello to
Mrs. Harper. The family had just gotten back from c from Calgary and there were
backpacks and snow boots in the hallway and running shoes in the kitchen. And as I entered the kitchen, there was Mrs.
Harper. She was standing there looking. She was beaming. And I said, "Congratulations, Loren. You won." And
you said, "I can't believe it. I never thought this was going to happen. I
really can't believe this." And I said, 'Well, when did it start to sink in? And she said, 'Well, this
morning it really felt real. And I said, 'Well, what happened?' And she said, 'The telephone rang and I thought it was
the carpet cleaners. And I told the person, "We don't need the carpets clean
today." And the woman on the phone said, "No, no, no, Mrs. Harper. I'm not calling from the carpet cleaners. I'm
calling from the White House, and I have George W. Bush on."
So I guess that's when it really started to sink in and of course it was a different time in Canada and the US
relationship. So thank you Mrs. Harper for taking on this incredible job. So I'd like to welcome the right honorable
Steven Harper to the stage with our board president Lois Mitchell to present the Royal Canadian Geographical
Society's gold medal. [applause]
[applause]
So, I'm going to read from the citation. The Royal Canadian Geographical Society
awards its gold medal to the right honorable Steven J. Harper in recognition of his distinguished career
in public service, including his tenure as the 22nd Prime Minister of Canada.
Mr. Harper emphasized the importance of Arctic sovereignty to Canada. His government oversaw the creation of
Canada's first urban national park in the Rouge Valley, protected Sable Island as a national park reserve. He expanded
Nahani National Park, and created a new national park in the Northwest Territories. He's also credited with
strengthening the Canadian economy through prudent management during the global financial crisis in 2008. And his
steady work and focus helped to expand Canada's trade networks globally. For
his exemplary leadership, the RCGS is honored to award the right honorable Steven J. Harper with its highest honor,
the gold medal. [applause]
[applause]
[applause] I got to look kind of looking straight ahead. Everybody wants a picture.
Great. Thank you. So, thank you, Lois. And
thank you. Congratulations, Mr. Harper. You can take the seat in the center,
premier minister of Canada. Joining Mr. Kretchen will be John Guyger, the CEO of
the Royal Canadian Geographical Society, who will moderate a conversation [applause]
between two [applause] former prime ministers about what are they talking about? Canadian unity, identity, and how
we protect a country we all love at a time of very complex geopolitics.
This is going to be good. Enjoy. Thank you, uh, Rosary, and thank you,
our honorables, for for joining us today. Um, four years ago, the
historian, uh, JL Grensteine created a list of Canada's national interests. He
argued few Canadians think about them and that the federal government scarcely ever bases policy on them. And it was a
very short list. So here they are. The first, Canada must protect its territory
and the security of its people. Second, Canada must strive to maintain its unity. Third, Canada must protect and
enhance its independence. Fourth, Canada must promote the economic growth of the nation to support the
prosperity and welfare of its people. And fifth, Canada should work with like-minded nations for the protection
and enhancement of freedom and democracy. I think it is probably fair to suggest
that Canadians are thinking about those national interests more these days. Um, we find ourselves at a moment that is
unprecedented, I think, in our lifetimes and for which many are concerned about the national interest. So, thank you
both for being here and Mr. Kretchen, particularly thank you for your presence, which is an honor to Mr.
Harper. Um, I would like to begin with a question for both of you as two Canadians who have devoted your careers
to strengthening Canada. You both had a strong interest in the Arctic. Uh, Mr. Cretchen, from your time
as Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, um, and later driving creation of major national parks
in in the in the north. And Mr. Harper, you had an Arctic policy that included a focus on from our standpoint focus on
searching for the lost ship to the Franklin expedition, but as part of a broader use it or lose it northern
sovereignty strategy. Yet, when you look at our history, including recent history, I think it's fair to say Canada
has failed to adequately defend its natural interest, its national interest in the Arctic. So, why was the Arctic
important to both of you? I wonder if you could just elaborate on your interest. First, I was a minister responsible
for more than six years, minister of Indian and Northern Affairs for more than six years and I developed a great
liking to go to the north and I enjoyed very very much. I went in all the places
and I knew about the history of the north because that land was
not clearly in the hand of Canadian and it is under the time of Louis
that Gordon Robertson who was a deputy minister of my department you know
started to move some Eskimo from northern Quebec to Greece
to clearly establish the presence of the Canadian on the
Elmir Island and it is quite recent that it was challenged at that time by the
Danish and the move made by Mr. Sal
led me to visit Greece Fior and I was the first minister to go there
ever and this week I received in my office
the grandson of the mayor when I visited that in 1971
when the premier of United so my connection with the north go far and I'm
happy that it's clearly Canadian him. And uh now some people look at Canada,
they would like to take it over from us, but we stand on guard. Don't worry.
[applause] I just always had a unlike Mr. Cretchen,
I didn't uh I I wasn't minister of everything one.
Um, but I had a long abiding interest in our our history and geography and
especially our northern history and always fascinated that, you know, the French and British actually fought in
naval battles in Hudson Bay. Like it's it's just it's unbelievable. Um, so it's
such great part of Canada. So look, but my concerns were different. I I think the reality is, you know, in in kind of
in law, Canada took possession of those territories in 1870 and then 1880. But
the reality is Canadian sovereign presence is extremely spotty, especially
up until the 1950s. And even after that, it kind of had periods of of neglect.
So, you know, I I believe that in the geopolitical circumstances I was taking
office in that there were long line threats to the north were actually quite serious. I think I think I've been borne
out in that regard. I didn't anticipate them being our southern neighbor. Um but um but nevertheless um you know we have
to be able but my view especially now we have to be able to do surveillance and
reach and ultimately defend all of our land seas and skies uh without the
support of allies and and I think we're entering an era where with uh new technology
that's actually quite feasible for us to do. So um yeah it's uh it's turned out to be more timely than I thought.
Absolutely. Um I don't doubt for a minute uh that most Canadians have a a
deep loyalty to their country. Uh you see outbursts of patriotism every now
and then uh recently with the Four Nations Cup last year. Just an enormous That was the best Conor McDavid. But
that was the best moment of 2025.
Conor, hopefully we have hopefully a prime minister could do something like that. Hopefully we'll have another Conor
McDavid best moment in the next couple of weeks as as Canada of course competes team Canada in the Olympics. But outside
of sports, how do we reinvigorate a sense of Canadian patriotism, especially following years in which we were told
that Canada is a country without a core identity, uh, without a mainstream? How how do we get Canadians excited about
the country? Well, let let me let me just tackle that one quickly. I I look,
we are living in an age, the one thing, you know, I travel around the world and business now, still do a bit of
politics. The one thing about this world, whether we like it or not, we are living in an age of nationalism
everywhere. Revive nationalism. And there is no reason why this country
should not be as nationalistic as anyone else. We have a lot to be proud of. Uh
it's a tremendous country. I think just about any person almost anywhere in the
world would love to to be here to have the circumstances of our country. We have a great history. Uh obviously we
have a great land, tremendous, you know, gift of providence, great land, but we have a great history and you know
there's been so much emphasis in the past, let's say, decade, you know, about
all the things we've done wrong. Um okay, fine. Um but look all the things
we've done wrong have been things that we like the things we've done right that we have built upon
um corrected mistakes and we built I think you quote cranian the best country
in the world. So you know let's be proud um and we don't our pride doesn't have to be just you know not like Donald
Trump we should be proud of who we are as a people and as a nation.
[applause] around the world they look at us. There
was an international survey a few months ago asking the people if you had to
start a new your life where would you like to go and around the globe Canada
came first and you know it is the others who see us this way. One of the problem is we
look back all the time rather than look at the future that we can build together.
Over the weekend I wrote a book about uh
this American who wanted to take Canada over in 178076
at the time of the revolution. Right. Uh the guy was Benedict Arnold. No no he came
but at that time they wanted to take us over. Yeah. And you know what was Canada at that
time? It was there was no Anglo folk. We were a colony of England and the Americans
were afraid that they were going to use Canadians to fight them in alliance with
the natives who tended to be with the Brits at that time. So
if we the franophhone had decided to join the American Revolution,
all you guys would have been obliged to go back to England because
because the loyalist could come to Canada. There was no Canada at that time
but the French Canadian that controlled the land. So if we were to look at what
we've built together rather than what divide us, it is the problem. and and
and be proud of of what we can offer. You know,
when I was you're in the geographic business apparently, so I claim that when I was minister of
Indian and affairs, responsible for park and when I was prime minister,
I made more land aside for conservation and national park than the number of
acres they have in France. And we have and we too
[applause] can talk like that. And do we have to be
proud? You know, we're political opponent, but we're not enemies. Not today.
and cuz he's afraid of the sh. [laughter]
No, but we have lived something that is an example to the world to have two
official languages that we know we have treated the natives
better than the Americans. Not as well as we should have, but much better. We never sent the army to kill
them. And uh we sent some missionaries who wanted to take them to heaven and it
was a controversy apparently but you know and the French were here and the
angophone came and now 50% of the population came from all the nation of
the world and they will never change you know their citizenship for anything else
and it's why everybody would give everything they have to have the privilege to come and share beare our
so-called miseries. You know, Jean talked about the u the
defense of of Canada by French Canadians during the American Revolution. Our organization, Government of Canada,
RCGS, we spent a lot of time celebrating the fact that all these different groups of Canadians, French, English native, um
came together to fight in the War of 1812, which is a great moment in in history. So, we've created this country,
created it through joint action, through joint defense, through joint economic building. I I just But I would say that
if I can, I got to get a dig in here. I would just say that the American Revolution, the War of 1812 are probably
better examples of Canadian unity than the Planes of Abraham. So,
Well, and the the incredible role of course that we cannot rewrite this story. [clears throat]
I was not dare to wake up more cal
and the Brits tend to arrive in the middle of the night. They did that in the fortland about 50 years ago.
So be aware, be awake [laughter] with Phineas Albia.
But you're right. The indigenous contribution to the War of 1812, which I think Canada would have been lost without the war who intervened.
We burned the White House, but we we will not repeat it. [laughter]
part of it's been torn down by the current income.
To that riffing off that, Mr. Harper, the last time you were on our stage,
Yeah. you said that Canadian sovereignty must be preserved at any cost. Yeah. And that the country must be prepared to
make any sacrifice necessary to ensure we remain an independent country. I'm wondering if that analysis still stands.
And Yeah, absolutely. You know, I I guess you know, Jean as obviously his history
as as a canon. My ancestors came to this country in
1774, one year before the American Revolution. My great great great great
grandfather led militia efforts in New Brunswick during both the Revolutionary
War and the War of 1812 to fight for the crown. Um, so it goes for for someone
like me, it goes back a long way. Um, yeah, I think the countries I look, I love the United States, but I'm not an
American. I think our country is different, worth preserving. Um, you know, I don't want to I don't want to
suggest that, you know, we should go around kind of accepting unacceptable
costs, but the fact of the matter is that the country's worth preserving that
I think there are costs that are going to have to be paid under the current circumstances to do that, but there's
also enormous opportunities. It's not all costs. There's a lot we can do that we haven't done to make ourselves more
competitive, more wealthy, more connected to the world. And this is an opportunity for us to take advantage of
these circumstances. So, let's do some nation building. Mr. Christian, you know, [applause]
I'm not at all. I think that we're living a very important time in the world. It's a big
shift. It is probably what I would call the beginning of the end of the American
empire and it has to come. All the empires change. So now you know it's
accelerating but we are in a very good position because
we have the land we have you know the best educated people in the world. Do
you know that? And we have the tolerance that is a great value.
We are the sharing that does not exist in many other countries. We have less
very very rich people per capita but less very very poor people too in
Canada. And we have the unity that we have to fight all the time about that.
It is it's there and it will always be there. But we have managed quite well to
survive you know and at this moment
our friend from the south has created a mood that a Canadian have never been so
proud to be Canadian. You know in my province of Quebec is still the same thing today. You know the the desire to
have a referendum is very low in Quebec. Don't know what the hell is going on in Alberta.
But I have to do there 500 cousins. I I didn't sign the petition.
Any tries did I want an answer. I'm told I'm told not.
Anyway, we're having fun. [laughter] Canada remaining. Don't worry.
Well, I guess just on that point, uh you each have dealt during your your tenure
as prime minister with the stress. Can I just say something about that? I was just going on Alberta. I just want
to tell you something about Quebec. It'd be interesting to see how the election unfolds there. But I recently ran into
it was actually the airport here in Ottawa. I won't name the name, but I ran into somebody who is a, you know, a very
very prominent long-term separatist. And he was saying to me, we were chatting,
what do you think? This is several months ago, Harper, about what premise what what President Trump's doing. And we chatted for a moment. And I ended by
saying, you know, I say, this is the reason why we have to stick together. And he lowered his voice and said to me,
you know, I think you're right. Well, and yet
at this very moment, we are this very moment, we we're at the
moment, we need to be strong and united. We are once again facing forces that would seek to pull us apart. And I guess
based on your experiences, Mr. Kretchen with Quebec sovereignty and sharper with western alienation. How do you think
Canada can strengthen national unity? What can we do at this moment? Those of us who love the country, deeply invested
in the future of the United Canada, what can we do to address those that sentiment in those places?
You know, the problem is we don't know enough the history of
Canada. I'm amazed by the ignorance of the people. You know, when I refer to
the fact that at the time of the American
Revolution, we decided to stay in Canada. Why? It's because the king of the day
guaranteed to the French the language and the Catholic religion.
And the pilgrim of bust were mad at the British because he had made a deal like
that and they wanted to take over Canada and he I was reading a book the other day this weekend described written by
Madame Dan. She's a journalist from Ottawa. It's called the he failed to
conquer. It's a great book about that period of time. And you know, we don't
know that that it is because of that we still speak French and they say that
we're miserable. You know, my colleague said that. I said it's terrible. We were 60,000 French Canadian in 1763
when by the day of Paris we were seated to the to the Brits.
Miserable that we are, we went from 60,000 to 9 million.
It's not that bad. And [applause]
it's more people in Belgium, in Switzerland, in Finland, in Sweden, in
Norway, you know, and yeah, Canada is the second largest
native franophhone country in the world. And Montreal,
so
Never been to Shuan. It's one of You're missing something.
We have We have a beautiful museum there. [laughter]
The French Museum called Canada in the world. And that uh they talk about my career.
They put My gifts are all displayed there [laughter]
and there is a great section called Madame and
[applause] it's all Canadian. Well, I think my people might have said whispered to me
that I probably didn't have a chance of winning and she went. Anyway, I was going to say um I don't
want to get too much into the politics. will just say this that you know in in our time in
office myself and colleagues here um you know Quebec the the the support for
Quebec sovereignty went to its lowest level since the early 1960s and support for western separatism
vanished completely. So um you know look there are people obviously in both parts of the country
who think differently but I think the reality is federal government manages this country right puts the stress on
unity and not on ideological tangents and there's no reason why we can't pull
the country together at this moment [applause]
the two of you clearly like and respect one another. I know you've got a bit of a road show you you uh you've embarked
upon from time to time and and despite the fact that you represent very different social and political
movements. Um what advice do you have for the current generation of political figures to enable them to disagree with
one another without stoking polarization in the country?
You know the communication of today have changed
and the gossips of the taverns you read them every morning on this little
machine and all that is terribly negative terribly negative and I don't know how
we will counter that because you have an article and only the people who are
negative very rarely you can be something under an article that refer to
what is positive in the article. It's always what can be negative. And so that
means that the young people have that in their head all the time and looking at that stuff a lot of time it was pure
invention lies and nobody correct them and that will have to be corrected. I
don't know. But I've I lived the same situation in a way. When I was elected
parliament, we had no TV, no radio, no nothing. It was a debating society
and there was a lot more, you know, now it's on TV. So it's done because, you know, they
read a text prepared by somebody else. The House of Commons in my time, you have not the time to have notes, the
right to have notes. If you could not speak up your mind, you could not talk. And if you lie, my that Trump would be
in trouble. If you lied in House of Commons and you
could not prove, you know, and then somebody accuse you of lying. If you cannot prove it, he was
expelled of the House of Congress. And all these things this values of what
is the truth seem to be have disappeared. They all look with what attract attention
what is attractive for the media and the communication of today and we'll have to
overcome that but we have overcome the era radio TV
television in the house and all that. So eventually we'll find a solution. Probably I will not be there to find it.
Yeah, look, I I I do think this is part of the challenge we're we're entering a different age of communications, social
media age. You know, we've gone through I tell you know, 75 years ago, however
long it was, 150 years ago, uh when Sir John A. Macdonald was going across the
country. He was stumping like he originally not even a train or horse and buggy went from town to town, got in a
park on a stump or a gazebo. And that's how he built a political campaign and built a political machine. And then we
had the radio age and we had the TV age and we had the 24-hour news cycle which
happened in your time and then social media was just really getting a getting
a a whole a momentum just near the end of my time and it it's changed everything because it's a whole new mode
of communications and um and you know it's it's a it's a new challenge for a
new generation to master that and I I agree I think there's advantages, there's disadvantages. Look, I I just think that
somehow uh you know, the next generation has to be able to to combine mastery of
the new modes of communication with with the kind of mature lessons of political leadership. And you know, I'd say one of
those is doesn't matter whether you're in government or opposition, you always need to be asking yourself if it's a
policy or a case of opposition, if it's a statement, you know, not just is it popular today,
but how's it going to look for you in a month or a year or in five years time? You've got to you can't be drawn into
the moment of the of the X tweet, you know? You've got to you've got to think
longer term and and there are times and you got to pick your battles, right?
Whether you're government or opposition, there are times like now where, you know, you have to decide we're not going
to fight about that. We'll fight about something. You always need to be fighting about something because the public needs to be given choices. But on
big things like, you know, Canadian sovereignty, you need to work together and the there's times where the
opposition needs to support the government and the opposition needs to know that if it does that, the government is not going to exploit that
to disadvantage the opposition. So there are times where you've got to use better judgment.
Now you I guess you voted for the cleric act, don't you? I I did. I not only did I put
You talk to me about it. I put the first draft of it in parliament.
show a bit of humility. [laughter] No, no, but no, no, but on that, you
know, he was in the opposition and he supported me, you know, and there was some problem with that probably for
him, not for me and but it is something that nobody remembered now. Nobody talks
about it. You know, if you read it, it's not only a vote. The question has to be
approved by parliament of Canada and if you want to separate there is a series of step that you to have followed that
are very complicated. So don't be think that because one night there will be a
vote there will be a a vote to go there's a lot of step that have to be
follow because before this thing happened and it is because we decided that at that time why because some
people were claiming that we won't vote we will lose Canada remember that I
remember I said that makes no sense you know one of my friend in forget his glasses home and I would not be a
candidate the day after because he would have voted. And those who were telling that one vote was enough. I used to make
the joke uh that uh you know
the NDP I don't want to talk politics. It's a reality.
Their name is an illegal name. They call themselves the New Democratic
Party since 70 years. So it's not new at all. So it's false advertising
and they wanted to change their name one day at the annual meeting and they
failed. You know why? Because they didn't have twothirds of the vote. So they were willing to let go the country
for one vote and not get another name. Then any lane they needed twothirds of
the vote. Just you know relax. Canada is there for a long time.
Thank you. [applause]
So, you're here today at Canada's Center for Geography and Exploration, and soon the entire country will be witnessing an
adventure of exploration at a level that no Canadian has ever previously achieved
the launch of Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen aboard Artemis 2, a mission to orbit the moon. He will
be the first nonamerican to reach the moon and he will be one of four people
to have been the furthest from earth of any human being ever. Um and he's a
Canadian and so obviously this is on a scale you know you talk about Bernier and Stephenson and some of the great
explorers of Canada's history um but this is on a level that's completely
beyond anything that they achieve. Um, in fact, it's more than a a great
achievement in Canadian history, but in in in world history. So, Mr. Ken, you met John Glenn and um I just wonder if
you have a message for Jeremy Hansen on the eve of this incredible moment.
But, you know, you're very impressed when you meet a person like that.
But it was something that uh was a great moment you know when I was a young girl
politician at that time and I thought it was a great day but uh it had been slow
on that course and now we're starting again to look at that to see if we cannot make more progress you know of
course science has made a lot of progress in the last 50 years and we'll
make a lot more but that will change a lot of our habits in life you We discussed some of the progress we made
that some kind of problem but to go to the moon is still very extraordinary and
to have a Canadian on the moon it would be a great day for us
yeah I I can only agree I think we were all you know I think of the moment um
Chris Hatfield's um you know time on the on the space station and uh I think one
of the great greatest music videos of all Hotfields.
You say that as a musician. Yeah. From from from outer space. So, you know, power to him. Represent us.
Just make sure that while you're you're up there and I'm sure it's a joint mission that uh you know, Trump hasn't
taken the Canadian flag down. Put up make sure we got our flag there. It's so
far so good. That looks looks great. So um uh prime ministers, you have
developed a genuine friendship over the past dec decade. I think I speak for many Canadians and I say that when you
are on stage together, you give hope to the idea that we have a lot more in common than we disagree on. Uh you show
that there is a better way and so thank you for your leadership uh of this great
country and thank you for your inspiring example today. Um, ladies and gentlemen,
I I would like to invite you now to all join us for a reception upstairs in the main gallery. And I hope you will take
along uh one of those RCGS True North Strong donation cards when you do. So,
thank you gentlemen very much. [applause]
[applause]